qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 5/6] hw/arm/sysbus-fdt: helpers for platform


From: Eric Auger
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 5/6] hw/arm/sysbus-fdt: helpers for platform bus nodes addition
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:16:54 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0

On 11/27/2014 01:56 PM, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> On 2014/11/27 20:25, Eric Auger wrote:
>> On 11/27/2014 01:07 PM, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>>> On 2014/10/31 21:53, Eric Auger wrote:
>>>> This new C module will be used by ARM machine files to generate
>>>> platform bus node and their dynamic sysbus device tree nodes.
>>>>
>>>> Dynamic sysbus device node addition is done in a machine init
>>>> done notifier. arm_register_platform_bus_fdt_creator does the
>>>> registration of this latter and is supposed to be called by
>>>> ARM machine files that support platform bus and their dynamic
>>>> sysbus. Addition of dynamic sysbus nodes is done only if the
>>>> user did not provide any dtb.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <address@hidden>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <address@hidden>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> v3 -> v4:
>>>> - dyn_sysbus_devtree.c renamed into sysbus-fdt.c
>>>> - use new PlatformBusDevice object
>>>> - the dtb upgrade is done through modify_dtb. Before the fdt
>>>>   was recreated from scratch. When the user provided a dtb this
>>>>   latter was overwritten which was not correct.
>>>> - an array contains the association between device type names
>>>>   and their node creation function
>>>> - I must aknowledge I did not find any cleaner way to implement
>>>>   a FDT_BUILDER interface, as suggested by Paolo. The class method
>>>>   would need to be initialized somewhere and since it cannot
>>>>   happen in the device itself - according to Alex & Peter comments -,
>>>>   I don't see when I shall associate the device type and its
>>>>   interface implementation.
>>>>
>>>> v2 -> v3:
>>>> - add arm_ prefix
>>>> - arm_sysbus_device_create_devtree becomes static
>>>>
>>>> v1 -> v2:
>>>> - Code moved in an arch specific file to accomodate architecture
>>>>   dependent specificities.
>>>> - remove platform_bus_base from PlatformDevtreeData
>>>>
>>>> v1: code originally written by Alex Graf in e500.c and reused for
>>>> ARM [Eric Auger]
>>>> ---
>>>>  hw/arm/Makefile.objs        |   1 +
>>>>  hw/arm/sysbus-fdt.c         | 181 
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  include/hw/arm/sysbus-fdt.h |  50 ++++++++++++
>>>>  3 files changed, 232 insertions(+)
>>>>  create mode 100644 hw/arm/sysbus-fdt.c
>>>>  create mode 100644 include/hw/arm/sysbus-fdt.h
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/hw/arm/Makefile.objs b/hw/arm/Makefile.objs
>>>> index 6088e53..0cc63e1 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/arm/Makefile.objs
>>>> +++ b/hw/arm/Makefile.objs
>>>> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DIGIC) += digic_boards.o
>>>>  obj-y += integratorcp.o kzm.o mainstone.o musicpal.o nseries.o
>>>>  obj-y += omap_sx1.o palm.o realview.o spitz.o stellaris.o
>>>>  obj-y += tosa.o versatilepb.o vexpress.o virt.o xilinx_zynq.o z2.o
>>>> +obj-y += sysbus-fdt.o
>>>>  
>>>>  obj-y += armv7m.o exynos4210.o pxa2xx.o pxa2xx_gpio.o pxa2xx_pic.o
>>>>  obj-$(CONFIG_DIGIC) += digic.o
>>>> diff --git a/hw/arm/sysbus-fdt.c b/hw/arm/sysbus-fdt.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..d5476f1
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/hw/arm/sysbus-fdt.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * ARM Platform Bus device tree generation helpers
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Copyright (c) 2014 Linaro Limited
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Authors:
>>>> + *  Alex Graf <address@hidden>
>>>> + *  Eric Auger <address@hidden>
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>>>> + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
>>>> + * version 2 or later, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
>>>> + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
>>>> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License 
>>>> for
>>>> + * more details.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License 
>>>> along with
>>>> + * this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>>>> + *
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#include "hw/arm/sysbus-fdt.h"
>>>> +#include "qemu/error-report.h"
>>>> +#include "sysemu/device_tree.h"
>>>> +#include "hw/platform-bus.h"
>>> [*]
>>>> +#include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
>>>> +#include "hw/platform-bus.h"
>>> [*]
>>> Duplicate include "hw/platform-bus.h"
>> Hi Shannon,
>>
>> thanks for pointing this out
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * internal struct that contains the information to create dynamic
>>>> + * sysbus device node
>>>> + */
>>>> +typedef struct PlatformBusFdtData {
>>>> +    void *fdt; /* device tree handle */
>>>> +    int irq_start; /* index of the first IRQ usable by platform bus 
>>>> devices */
>>>> +    const char *pbus_node_name; /* name of the platform bus node */
>>>> +    PlatformBusDevice *pbus;
>>>> +} PlatformBusFdtData;
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * struct used when calling the machine init done notifier
>>>> + * that constructs the fdt nodes of platform bus devices
>>>> + */
>>>> +typedef struct PlatformBusFdtNotifierParams {
>>>> +    ARMPlatformBusFdtParams *fdt_params;
>>>> +    Notifier notifier;
>>>> +} PlatformBusFdtNotifierParams;
>>>> +
>>>> +/* struct that associates a device type name and a node creation function 
>>>> */
>>>> +typedef struct NodeCreationPair {
>>>> +    const char *typename;
>>>> +    int (*add_fdt_node_fn)(SysBusDevice *sbdev, void *opaque);
>>>> +} NodeCreationPair;
>>>> +
>>>> +/* list of supported dynamic sysbus devices */
>>>> +NodeCreationPair add_fdt_node_functions[] = {
>>>> +        {"", NULL}, /*last element*/
>>>> +};
>>>
>>> Eric, I have a question about how to use this.
>>> If I want to dynamically add a device, I must add a member in above array, 
>>> such as {TYPE_PFD, pfd_add_fdt_node}.
>>> And the "pfd_add_fdt_node" is defined by myself which is used to 
>>> dynamically generate the device fdt node.
>>>
>>> Am I right ?
>> yes that's correct. You can find an example (Calxeda midway xgmac) in
>> [PATCH v7 12/16] hw/arm/sysbus-fdt: enable vfio-calxeda-xgmac dynamic
>> (https://patches.linaro.org/39910/).
>>
> Hi Eric,
> 
> Thanks for your reply.
> 
> Assuming that I want to add a device "TYPE_PFD". I create a pfd.c in hw/arm/.
> 
> As the "pfd_add_fdt_node" is associated with device "TYPE_PFD", so I just 
> want to let it in pfd.c.
> But the struct PlatformBusFdtData is an internal struct which means I have to 
> move "pfd_add_fdt_node"
> to sysbus-fdt.c. If so, I think it's a little interleaving. And the file 
> sysbus-fdt.c is a little messy.
> 
> What do you think about moving the associated struct to sysbus-fdt.h ?


> 
> And I think the array add_fdt_node_functions is not convenient to add a new 
> add_fdt_node_fn for a new device.
> Maybe a global register function would be better.

Hi Shannon,

Sorry but I don't know what the pfd device correspond to. Please could
you elaborate on it or provide me with a link?

Besides I just wanted to warn you about the fact for the time being
quite few sysbus devices are supposed to be instantiated from command
line. We need to make sure this is the case for pfd. Also in the past we
discussed about the the relevance of putting the device node generation
in the (sysbus) device and I did some patch for that and Alex and Peter
convinced me this was a bad idea overall. Now we are talking about
devices that were generic (not arch specific), like vfio. In case of an
ARM specific device it might be worth to submit this point on the ML.
Besides the current philosophy was to put the device tree node creation
function in sysbus-fdt.c and not in the device file. Already there is
some uncertainty about relevance of putting this outside of the machine
file, according to Alex.

Eric


> 
> Thanks,
> Shannon
> 
>> I am currently reworking this according to Alex comments but the spirit
>> remains the same.
>>
>> Please do not hesitate to come back to me if you have other questions.
>>
>> Best Regards
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]