qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] rtl8139: fix Pointer to local outside scope


From: Gonglei
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] rtl8139: fix Pointer to local outside scope
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 16:18:39 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1

On 2014/11/20 16:11, Jason Wang wrote:

> On 11/20/2014 04:05 PM, Gonglei wrote:
>> On 2014/11/20 15:50, Jason Wang wrote:
>>
>>>>> Maybe just initialize iov unconditionally at the beginning and check
>>>>>>> dot1q_buf instead of iov for the rest of the functions. (Need deal with
>>>>>>> size < ETHER_ADDR_LEN * 2)
>>>>> More complicated, because we can't initialize iov when
>>>>>  "size < ETHER_ADDR_LEN * 2".
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> -Gonglei
>>>>>
>>> Probably not: you can just do something like:
>>>
>>>     if (dot1q_buf && size < ETHER_ADDR_LEN * 2) {
>>>         dot1q_buf = NULL;
>>>     }
>>>
>>> and check dot1q_buf afterwards. Or just drop the packet since its size
>>> was less than mininum frame length that Ethernet allows.
>> Sorry, I don't understand. But,
>> what's your meaning "initialize iov unconditionally at the beginning"?
> 
> Something like:
> 
> @@ -1774,7 +1774,12 @@ static uint32_t
> rtl8139_RxConfig_read(RTL8139State *s)
>  static void rtl8139_transfer_frame(RTL8139State *s, uint8_t *buf, int size,
>      int do_interrupt, const uint8_t *dot1q_buf)
>  {
> -    struct iovec *iov = NULL;
> +    struct iovec iov[3] = {
> +        { .iov_base = buf, .iov_len = ETHER_ADDR_LEN * 2 },
> +        { .iov_base = (void *) dot1q_buf, .iov_len = VLAN_HLEN },
> +        { .iov_base = buf + ETHER_ADDR_LEN * 2,
> +          .iov_len = size - ETHER_ADDR_LEN * 2 },
> +    };
> 
> and assign dot1q_buf to NULL is size is not ok.
> 

If "size <  ETHER_ADDR_LEN * 2", .iov_len = size - ETHER_ADDR_LEN * 2 will be
negative value;
and if dot1q_buf is NULL, .iov_base = (void *) dot1q_buf will be NULL too. Any 
side-effect?

> Just a suggestion, your call.

Thanks, Jason :)

Best regards,
-Gonglei



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]