[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] trace: tighten up trace-events regex to fix bad
From: |
Lluís Vilanova |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] trace: tighten up trace-events regex to fix bad parse |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:35:22 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
> Use \w for properties and trace event names since they are both drawn
> from [a-zA-Z0-9_] character sets.
> The .* for matching properties was too aggressive and caused the
> following failure with foo(int rc) "(this is a test)":
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "scripts/tracetool.py", line 139, in <module>
> main(sys.argv)
> File "scripts/tracetool.py", line 134, in main
> binary=binary, probe_prefix=probe_prefix)
> File "scripts/tracetool/__init__.py", line 334, in generate
> events = _read_events(fevents)
> File "scripts/tracetool/__init__.py", line 262, in _read_events
> res.append(Event.build(line))
> File "scripts/tracetool/__init__.py", line 225, in build
> return Event(name, props, fmt, args, arg_fmts)
> File "scripts/tracetool/__init__.py", line 185, in __init__
> % ", ".join(unknown_props))
> ValueError: Unknown properties: foo(int, rc)
> Cc: Lluís Vilanova <address@hidden>
> Reported-by: Eric Auger <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
> ---
> scripts/tracetool/__init__.py | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/scripts/tracetool/__init__.py b/scripts/tracetool/__init__.py
> index 36c789d..474f11b 100644
> --- a/scripts/tracetool/__init__.py
> +++ b/scripts/tracetool/__init__.py
> @@ -140,8 +140,8 @@ class Event(object):
> The format strings for each argument.
> """
> - _CRE = re.compile("((?P<props>.*)\s+)?"
> - "(?P<name>[^(\s]+)"
> + _CRE = re.compile("((?P<props>\w*)\s+)?"
> + "(?P<name>\w+)"
> "\((?P<args>[^)]*)\)"
> "\s*"
> "(?:(?:(?P<fmt_trans>\".+),)?\s*(?P<fmt>\".+))?"
The previous implementation allowed multiple properties. Maybe this should be
instead (which still allows multiple properties):
"((?P<props>[\w\s]+)\s+)?"
"(?P<name>\w+)\s*"
...
Thanks,
Lluis
--
"And it's much the same thing with knowledge, for whenever you learn
something new, the whole world becomes that much richer."
-- The Princess of Pure Reason, as told by Norton Juster in The Phantom
Tollbooth