[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] virtio-blk: dataplane: notify guest as a ba
From: |
Ming Lei |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] virtio-blk: dataplane: notify guest as a batch |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Jul 2014 22:52:49 +0800 |
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 8:55 PM, Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> wrote:
> Il 04/07/2014 14:27, Ming Lei ha scritto:
>
>> Now requests are submitted as a batch, so it is natural
>> to notify guest as a batch too.
>>
>> This may supress interrupt notification to VM:
>>
>> - in my test, decreased by ~13K/sec
>
>
> I don't think this can work. Requests are not completed FIFO.
Yes, you are right.
What I want to do is to keep old dataplane's behavior: only call
notify_guest() one time for one IO completion.
Switching to QEMU block makes it a bit difficult to implement, especially
with io plug & unplug.
One approach I thought of is to introduce a notifier in bs->file, and
write it inside linux aio completion handler, which looks a bit ugly, but
shouldn't have performance effect because io completion becomes
less frequent with io plug.
>
> What you can do is change notify_guest to something like
>
> qemu_bh_schedule(req->dev->dataplane->notify_guest_bh);
>
> and do the actual notification in the bottom half. This should ensure that
> multiple notifications are coalesced, but it may also introduce new
> aio_notify calls even with my patch (a BH scheduled from a BH currently does
> an aio_notify; this can be fixed).
I think we can do better than above because one aio IO completes lots of
requests, and we just need to notify guest for all these requests.
Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>> hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 1 +
>> include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c
>> b/hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c
>> index e88862d..9d36659 100644
>> --- a/hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c
>> +++ b/hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c
>> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ struct VirtIOBlockDataPlane {
>> AioContext *ctx;
>> EventNotifier host_notifier; /* doorbell */
>>
>> + VirtIOBlockReq *last_submit;
>> +
>> /* Operation blocker on BDS */
>> Error *blocker;
>> void (*saved_complete_request)(struct VirtIOBlockReq *req,
>> @@ -67,7 +69,10 @@ static void complete_request_vring(VirtIOBlockReq *req,
>> unsigned char status)
>>
>> vring_push(&req->dev->dataplane->vring, &req->elem,
>> req->qiov.size + sizeof(*req->in));
>> - notify_guest(req->dev->dataplane);
>> +
>> + if (req->last) {
>> + notify_guest(req->dev->dataplane);
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> static void handle_notify(EventNotifier *e)
>> @@ -101,6 +106,8 @@ static void handle_notify(EventNotifier *e)
>> req->elem.index);
>>
>> virtio_blk_handle_request(req, &mrb);
>> +
>> + s->last_submit = req;
>> }
>>
>> virtio_submit_multiwrite(s->blk->conf.bs, &mrb);
>> @@ -116,6 +123,10 @@ static void handle_notify(EventNotifier *e)
>> break;
>> }
>> }
>> +
>> + if (s->last_submit) {
>> + s->last_submit->last = true;
>> + }
>> bdrv_io_unplug(s->blk->conf.bs);
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
>> index 02cd6b0..86b37f7 100644
>> --- a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
>> +++ b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
>> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ VirtIOBlockReq *virtio_blk_alloc_request(VirtIOBlock *s)
>> req->dev = s;
>> req->qiov.size = 0;
>> req->next = NULL;
>> + req->last = false;
>> return req;
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h
>> b/include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h
>> index 992da26..07659c3 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h
>> @@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ typedef struct VirtIOBlockReq {
>> QEMUIOVector qiov;
>> struct VirtIOBlockReq *next;
>> BlockAcctCookie acct;
>> + bool last;
>> } VirtIOBlockReq;
>>
>> #define DEFINE_VIRTIO_BLK_FEATURES(_state, _field) \
>>
>
>