qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2.1 21/36] qapi event: convert BLOCK_IO_ERROR an


From: Luiz Capitulino
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2.1 21/36] qapi event: convert BLOCK_IO_ERROR and BLOCK_JOB_ERROR
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:00:41 -0400

On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 17:58:21 +0200
Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:

> Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Il 26/06/2014 17:37, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
> >> Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> writes:
> >> 
> >>> From: Wenchao Xia <address@hidden>
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia <address@hidden>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> >> 
> >> This broke tests/qemu-iotests/041.  Apparently, the BLOCK_JOB_ERROR
> >> event changed from
> >> 
> >>     {'timestamp': {'seconds': 1403796871, 'microseconds': 446502},
> >>      'data': {'device': 'drive0',
> >
> > - bdrv_emit_qmp_error_event(job->bs, QEVENT_BLOCK_JOB_ERROR, action,
> > is_read);
> > +    qapi_event_send_block_job_error(bdrv_get_device_name(bs),
> >
> > Should have been job->bs.
> 
> Will you post a patch, or would you like me to do that?

I was going to do it myself, but it would be great if you could do that.

> 
> >>               'action': 'ignore',
> >>               'operation': 'write'},
> >>      'event': 'BLOCK_JOB_ERROR'}
> >> 
> >> to
> >> 
> >>     {'timestamp': {'seconds': 1403796674, 'microseconds': 63271},
> >>      'data': {'device': '',
> >>               'action': 'report',
> >
> > I suppose ignore vs. report is just from pasting two different sections?
> 
> Could well be; it's almost time for Fußball & Bier ;)
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]