qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 02/20] block: Handle failure for potentially


From: Benoît Canet
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 02/20] block: Handle failure for potentially large allocations
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:08:03 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

The Wednesday 28 May 2014 à 16:37:35 (+0200), Kevin Wolf wrote :
> Some code in the block layer makes potentially huge allocations. Failure
> is not completely unexpected there, so avoid aborting qemu and handle
> out-of-memory situations gracefully.
> 
> This patch addresses bounce buffer allocations in block.c. While at it,
> convert bdrv_commit() from plain g_malloc() to qemu_try_blockalign().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <address@hidden>
> ---
>  block.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
> index dc9bcbd..0e11376 100644
> --- a/block.c
> +++ b/block.c
> @@ -2271,7 +2271,14 @@ int bdrv_commit(BlockDriverState *bs)
>      }
>  
>      total_sectors = length >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> -    buf = g_malloc(COMMIT_BUF_SECTORS * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
> +
> +    /* qemu_try_blockalign() for bs will choose an alignment that works for
> +     * bs->backing_hd as well, so no need to compare the alignment manually. 
> */
> +    buf = qemu_try_blockalign(bs, COMMIT_BUF_SECTORS * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
> +    if (buf == NULL) {
> +        ret = -ENOMEM;
> +        goto ro_cleanup;
> +    }
>  
>      for (sector = 0; sector < total_sectors; sector += n) {
>          ret = bdrv_is_allocated(bs, sector, COMMIT_BUF_SECTORS, &n);
> @@ -2309,7 +2316,7 @@ int bdrv_commit(BlockDriverState *bs)
>  
>      ret = 0;
>  ro_cleanup:
> -    g_free(buf);
> +    qemu_vfree(buf);
>  
>      if (ro) {
>          /* ignoring error return here */
> @@ -2970,7 +2977,12 @@ static int coroutine_fn 
> bdrv_co_do_copy_on_readv(BlockDriverState *bs,
>                                     cluster_sector_num, cluster_nb_sectors);
>  
>      iov.iov_len = cluster_nb_sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
> -    iov.iov_base = bounce_buffer = qemu_blockalign(bs, iov.iov_len);
> +    iov.iov_base = bounce_buffer = qemu_try_blockalign(bs, iov.iov_len);
> +    if (iov.iov_len && bounce_buffer == NULL) {
> +        ret = -ENOMEM;
> +        goto err;
> +    }
> +
>      qemu_iovec_init_external(&bounce_qiov, &iov, 1);
>  
>      ret = drv->bdrv_co_readv(bs, cluster_sector_num, cluster_nb_sectors,
> @@ -3242,7 +3254,11 @@ static int coroutine_fn 
> bdrv_co_do_write_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
>              /* Fall back to bounce buffer if write zeroes is unsupported */
>              iov.iov_len = num * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;
>              if (iov.iov_base == NULL) {
> -                iov.iov_base = qemu_blockalign(bs, num * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
> +                iov.iov_base = qemu_try_blockalign(bs, num * 
> BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
Are we sure num never === 0 ? This would render the test false.

> +                if (iov.iov_base == NULL) {
> +                    ret = -ENOMEM;
> +                    goto fail;
> +                }
>                  memset(iov.iov_base, 0, num * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE);
>              }
>              qemu_iovec_init_external(&qiov, &iov, 1);
> @@ -3262,6 +3278,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn 
> bdrv_co_do_write_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs,
>          nb_sectors -= num;
>      }
>  
> +fail:
>      qemu_vfree(iov.iov_base);
>      return ret;
>  }
> @@ -4570,8 +4587,9 @@ static void bdrv_aio_bh_cb(void *opaque)
>  {
>      BlockDriverAIOCBSync *acb = opaque;
>  
> -    if (!acb->is_write)
> +    if (!acb->is_write && acb->ret >= 0) {
>          qemu_iovec_from_buf(acb->qiov, 0, acb->bounce, acb->qiov->size);
> +    }
>      qemu_vfree(acb->bounce);
>      acb->common.cb(acb->common.opaque, acb->ret);
>      qemu_bh_delete(acb->bh);
> @@ -4593,10 +4611,12 @@ static BlockDriverAIOCB 
> *bdrv_aio_rw_vector(BlockDriverState *bs,
>      acb = qemu_aio_get(&bdrv_em_aiocb_info, bs, cb, opaque);
>      acb->is_write = is_write;
>      acb->qiov = qiov;
> -    acb->bounce = qemu_blockalign(bs, qiov->size);
> +    acb->bounce = qemu_try_blockalign(bs, qiov->size);
>      acb->bh = qemu_bh_new(bdrv_aio_bh_cb, acb);
>  
> -    if (is_write) {
> +    if (qiov->size && acb->bounce == NULL) {
> +        acb->ret = -ENOMEM;
> +    } else if (is_write) {
>          qemu_iovec_to_buf(acb->qiov, 0, acb->bounce, qiov->size);
>          acb->ret = bs->drv->bdrv_write(bs, sector_num, acb->bounce, 
> nb_sectors);
>      } else {
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]