qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH net v1 0/4] Cadence GEM patches


From: Michael Tokarev
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH net v1 0/4] Cadence GEM patches
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 11:17:52 +0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.5.0

24.05.2014 03:06, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> Ping^2!
> 
> I'll try trivial queue too :)

Actually this looks like trivial material.

I'll comment in one place, for all.


>>> Peter Crosthwaite (4):
>>>   net: cadence_gem: Fix Tx descriptor update

This appears to be a bugfix, but with an interesting "incomplete"
update:

...
+            unsigned    desc_first[2];
...
             cpu_physical_memory_read(s->tx_desc_addr,
-                                     (uint8_t *)&desc[0], sizeof(desc));
+                                     (uint8_t *)&desc_first[0], sizeof(desc));

sizeof(desc_first), not sizeof(desc).  Also can drop extra
"readdressing".

>>>   net: cadence_gem: Add Tx descriptor fetch printf

+    DB_PRINT("read descriptor 0x%x\n", (unsigned)packet_desc_addr);

packet_desc_addr is hwaddr, which is uint64_t, here it is being cast
to unsigned,  Is it right?  Other code in this file does the same,
but it still does not mean it's right.  Maybe it is because it uses
only the lower 32 bits of it, or that the high bits just aren't
useful for debugging?

>>>   net: cadence_gem: Fix top comment

I applied this one.

>>>   net: cadence_gem: Comment spelling sweep

This look okay, except that it clashes a bit with the first.

/mjt



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]