|
From: | Brad Smith |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU build broken |
Date: | Sat, 10 May 2014 20:22:03 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 TenFourFox/G5 Tenfourbird |
On 10/05/14 3:07 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 10/05/2014 08:45, Brad Smith ha scritto:Having your feature in-tree is a privilege, not a right. You earn it by helping to maintain it. "it's not really maintained right now" means it has not been earning its keep. You're encouraged to remedy that.Huh? "my feature"? I have nothing to do with this. What kind of crazy is this? How to misdirect and not take responsibility for breaking something. If there wasn't sloppy irresponsible development in the first place it wouldn't be an issue.Brad, all this is doing, is convincing people that bsd-user is not worth keeping in the tree. It's a fact that in a million-line codebase not all patches can be tested by all people.
My posts have nothing to do with bsd-user. I don't give a shit about it.The real issue is the process and the fact that someone removed a constant from the configure script and didn't even grep the tree to see
if it existed anywhere else. That is very sloppy.
Why don't you send a patch instead of whining?
Constantly trying to deflect from the real issues. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |