qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V26 03/32] QemuOpts: repurpose qemu_opts_print t


From: Chun Yan Liu
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V26 03/32] QemuOpts: repurpose qemu_opts_print to replace print_option_parameters
Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 21:20:29 -0600


>>> On 4/30/2014 at 12:30 AM, in message <address@hidden>, Eric Blake
<address@hidden> wrote: 
> On 04/29/2014 03:10 AM, Chunyan Liu wrote: 
> > Currently this function is not used anywhere. In later patches, it will 
> > replace print_option_parameters. To avoid print info changes, change 
> > qemu_opts_print from fprintf stderr to printf to keep consistent with 
> > print_option_parameters, remove last printf and print size/number with 
> > opt->value.uint instead of opt->str. 
> >  
> > Signed-off-by: Chunyan Liu <address@hidden> 
> > --- 
> >  util/qemu-option.c | 10 ++++++---- 
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) 
>  
> I would prefer to see this patch first, and 2/32 second; I'd also prefer 
> to see the signature change (changing int to void return, and dropping 
> dummy parameter) in this patch. 
>  
> > +        } else if ((desc->type == QEMU_OPT_SIZE || 
> > +                    desc->type == QEMU_OPT_NUMBER) && opt) { 
> > +            printf("%s=%" PRId64 " ", desc->name, opt->value.uint); 
>  
> Shouldn't this  be PRIu64, since you are printing an unsigned int? 

print_option_parameters uses PRId64, so here using PRId64 too to keep
output unchanged. In qemu-iotests, there are some tests having negative
size, like 'size=-1024', changing to PRIu64 will cause such iotests failed.

>  
> --  
> Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266 
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org 
>  
>  





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]