qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] s390x: empty function stubs in preparation


From: Christian Borntraeger
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] s390x: empty function stubs in preparation for __KVM_HAVE_GUEST_DEBUG
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 16:56:02 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0

On 24/04/14 10:51, Jens Freimann wrote:
> From: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
> 
> This patch creates empty function stubs (used by the gdbserver) in preparation
> for the hw debugging support by kvm on s390, which will enable the
> __KVM_HAVE_GUEST_DEBUG define in the linux headers and require these methods 
> on
> the qemu side.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Freimann <address@hidden>
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <address@hidden>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <address@hidden>


Conny, can you take that patch in your next pull request? Otherwise
qemu will fail to build as soon as somebody does a headersync from kvm/queue.


> Cc: address@hidden
> ---
>  target-s390x/kvm.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/target-s390x/kvm.c b/target-s390x/kvm.c
> index 56b9af7..2b2dcdc 100644
> --- a/target-s390x/kvm.c
> +++ b/target-s390x/kvm.c
> @@ -383,6 +383,26 @@ int kvm_arch_remove_sw_breakpoint(CPUState *cs, struct 
> kvm_sw_breakpoint *bp)
>      return 0;
>  }
> 
> +int kvm_arch_insert_hw_breakpoint(target_ulong addr,
> +                                  target_ulong len, int type)
> +{
> +    return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arch_remove_hw_breakpoint(target_ulong addr,
> +                                  target_ulong len, int type)
> +{
> +    return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_arch_remove_all_hw_breakpoints(void)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_arch_update_guest_debug(CPUState *cpu, struct kvm_guest_debug *dbg)
> +{
> +}
> +
>  void kvm_arch_pre_run(CPUState *cpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>  {
>  }
> @@ -844,6 +864,11 @@ static int handle_tsch(S390CPU *cpu)
>      return ret;
>  }
> 
> +static int kvm_arch_handle_debug_exit(S390CPU *cpu)
> +{
> +    return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +
>  int kvm_arch_handle_exit(CPUState *cs, struct kvm_run *run)
>  {
>      S390CPU *cpu = S390_CPU(cs);
> @@ -859,6 +884,9 @@ int kvm_arch_handle_exit(CPUState *cs, struct kvm_run 
> *run)
>          case KVM_EXIT_S390_TSCH:
>              ret = handle_tsch(cpu);
>              break;
> +        case KVM_EXIT_DEBUG:
> +            ret = kvm_arch_handle_debug_exit(cpu);
> +            break;
>          default:
>              fprintf(stderr, "Unknown KVM exit: %d\n", run->exit_reason);
>              break;
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]