qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5] tcg-aarch64: Properly detect SIGSEGV writes


From: Claudio Fontana
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5] tcg-aarch64: Properly detect SIGSEGV writes
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 17:40:09 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1

On 16.04.2014 17:14, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Since the kernel doesn't pass any info on the reason for the fault,
> disassemble the instruction to detect a store.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
> ---
> 
> Rather than spam the rest of the reviewed patch series to the list,
> I'm just sending the update of the one patch that had issues.
> 
> From v4, Claudio correctly diagnosed that I had missed the 128-bit
> stores.  Unfortunately, opcode 2 is used for both loads and stores,
> so one has to use a different mask for them.
> 
> Previous revisions had a comment about how some of these tests could
> be merged.  Adding another 7 for the 128-bit stores seemed a bridge
> too far, so I did some easy merging.
> 
> There are two groups of insns that differ only in pre-/post-/no-increment,
> or that vary only in fields that don't matter (register input vs immediate
> input).  I no longer try to distinguish those.
> 
> In the case of C3.3.8-12, there are combinations of bits 10, 11, 21 that
> are not valid insns.  But since we don't really need to be a full
> disassembler I think that'll be fine for now.
> 
> With any luck the kernel patch that passes the relevent data down from
> the trap will be accepted upstream soon, and this will just be legacy.
> 
> 
> r~
> 
> ---
>  user-exec.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/user-exec.c b/user-exec.c
> index bc58056..8ed6fec 100644
> --- a/user-exec.c
> +++ b/user-exec.c
> @@ -465,16 +465,29 @@ int cpu_signal_handler(int host_signum, void *pinfo,
>  
>  #elif defined(__aarch64__)
>  
> -int cpu_signal_handler(int host_signum, void *pinfo,
> -                       void *puc)
> +int cpu_signal_handler(int host_signum, void *pinfo, void *puc)
>  {
>      siginfo_t *info = pinfo;
>      struct ucontext *uc = puc;
> -    uint64_t pc;
> -    int is_write = 0; /* XXX how to determine? */
> +    uintptr_t pc = uc->uc_mcontext.pc;
> +    uint32_t insn = *(uint32_t *)pc;
> +    bool is_write;
>  
> -    pc = uc->uc_mcontext.pc;
> -    return handle_cpu_signal(pc, (uint64_t)info->si_addr,
> +    /* XXX: need kernel patch to get write flag faster.  */
> +    is_write = (   (insn & 0xbfff0000) == 0x0c000000   /* C3.3.1 */
> +                || (insn & 0xbfe00000) == 0x0c800000   /* C3.3.2 */
> +                || (insn & 0xbfdf0000) == 0x0d000000   /* C3.3.3 */
> +                || (insn & 0xbfc00000) == 0x0d800000   /* C3.3.4 */
> +                || (insn & 0x3f400000) == 0x08000000   /* C3.3.6 */
> +                || (insn & 0x3bc00000) == 0x39000000   /* C3.3.13 */
> +                || (insn & 0x3fc00000) == 0x3d800000   /* ... 128bit */
> +                /* Ingore bits 10, 11 & 21, controlling indexing.  */
> +                || (insn & 0x3bc00000) == 0x38000000   /* C3.3.8-12 */
> +                || (insn & 0x3fe00000) == 0x3c800000   /* ... 128bit */
> +                /* Ignore bits 23 & 24, controlling indexing.  */
> +                || (insn & 0x3a400000) == 0x28000000); /* C3.3.7,14-16 */
> +
> +    return handle_cpu_signal(pc, (uintptr_t)info->si_addr,
>                               is_write, &uc->uc_sigmask, puc);
>  }
>  
> 

Reviewed-by: Claudio Fontana <address@hidden>






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]