qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.0] kvm_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap: ignore


From: Serge Hallyn
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.0] kvm_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap: ignore ENOENT from kvm_vm_ioctl
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 21:10:26 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Quoting Paolo Bonzini (address@hidden):
> Il 11/04/2014 04:31, Michael Tokarev ha scritto:
> >ENOENT means the kernel has an empty dirty bitmap for this
> >slot.  Don't abort in that case.  This appears to solve
> >the bug reported at
> >
> >https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1303926
> >
> >which first showed up with commit b533f658a98325d: fix return
> >check for KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG ioctl
> >
> >Cc: Serge Hallyn <address@hidden>
> >Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <address@hidden>
> >---
> > kvm-all.c |   10 ++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
> >index cd4111d..47fa948 100644
> >--- a/kvm-all.c
> >+++ b/kvm-all.c
> >@@ -441,13 +441,19 @@ static int 
> >kvm_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap(MemoryRegionSection *section)
> >
> >         d.slot = mem->slot;
> >
> >-        if (kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG, &d) < 0) {
> >+        ret = kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG, &d);
> >+        if (ret >= 0) {
> >+            /* regular case, process returned bitmap */
> >+            kvm_get_dirty_pages_log_range(section, d.dirty_bitmap);
> >+        } else if (ret == -ENOENT) {
> >+            /* kernel does not have dirty bitmap in this slot */
> >+            ret = 0;
> >+        } else {
> >             DPRINTF("ioctl failed %d\n", errno);
> >             ret = -1;
> >             break;
> >         }
> >
> >-        kvm_get_dirty_pages_log_range(section, d.dirty_bitmap);
> >         start_addr = mem->start_addr + mem->memory_size;
> >     }
> >     g_free(d.dirty_bitmap);
> >
> 
> I'd rather revert b533f658a98325d instead.

That seems wrong though.  If we want to ignore all errors that's one
thing, but before that commit we just ignored all errors other than
EPERM.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]