qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/97] savevm: Remove all the unneded version_mi


From: Juan Quintela
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/97] savevm: Remove all the unneded version_minimum_id_old (Massive)
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 13:47:38 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)

Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 7 April 2014 04:20, Juan Quintela <address@hidden> wrote:
>> After previous Peter patch, they are redundant.  This way we don't asign them
>> except when needed.  Once there, there were lots of case where the ".fields"
>> indentation was wrong:
>>
>>      .fields = (VMStateField []) {
>> and
>>      .fields =      (VMStateField []) {
>>
>> Change all the combinations to:
>>
>>      .fields = (VMStateField[]){
>>
>> The biggest problem (appart of aesthetics) was that checkpatch complained
>> when we copy&pasted the code from one place to another.
>>
>>  211 files changed, 289 insertions(+), 621 deletions(-)
>
> I'm really not a fan of this kind of single patch that
> touches a huge number of files at once. They're basically
> impossible to review and they introduce the possibility
> of conflicts between submaintainer tree changes and the
> big patch. There's no reason to have all these changes
> in a single patch -- I'd much rather see one patch per
> subsystem sent to the relevant submaintainers, plus
> one for all the unmaintained stuff which can go via
> the migration tree.

If you say how to split, I am all for it.  But remomeber that all this
changes go inside VMSTateDescription descriptions, touch nothing else
outside of that.  And that is not something that is touched a lot to
have lots of conflicts.

My problem with leaving things as are, is that people continue to copy
from the ones that still use the old system/format :-(

Later, Juan.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]