qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Don't enable a HPET timer if HPET is disabled


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Don't enable a HPET timer if HPET is disabled
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 10:01:28 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0

Il 22/02/2014 05:37, Matt Lupfer ha scritto:
A HPET timer can be started when HPET is not yet
enabled. This will not generate an interrupt
to the guest, but causes problems when HPET is later
enabled.

A timer that is created and expires at least once before
HPET is enabled will have an initialized comparator based
on a hpet_offset of 0 (uninitialized). When HPET is
enabled, hpet_set_timer() is called a second time, which
modifies the timer expiry to a time based on the
difference between current ticks (measured with the
newly initialized hpet_offset) and the timer's
comparator (which was generated before hpet_offset was
initialized). This results in a long period of no HPET
timer ticks.

When this occurs with a CentOS 5.x guest, the guest
may not receive timer interrupts during its narrow
timer check window and panic on boot.

Signed-off-by: Matt Lupfer <address@hidden>
---
 hw/timer/hpet.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/timer/hpet.c b/hw/timer/hpet.c
index 1264dfd..e15d6bc 100644
--- a/hw/timer/hpet.c
+++ b/hw/timer/hpet.c
@@ -506,7 +506,8 @@ static void hpet_ram_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
                 timer->cmp = (uint32_t)timer->cmp;
                 timer->period = (uint32_t)timer->period;
             }
-            if (activating_bit(old_val, new_val, HPET_TN_ENABLE)) {
+            if (activating_bit(old_val, new_val, HPET_TN_ENABLE) &&
+                hpet_enabled(s)) {
                 hpet_set_timer(timer);
             } else if (deactivating_bit(old_val, new_val, HPET_TN_ENABLE)) {
                 hpet_del_timer(timer);


Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]