qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Human Monitor: migrate command (without -d) now


From: Soramichi AKIYAMA
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Human Monitor: migrate command (without -d) now blocks correctly
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:06:47 +0900

On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:18:03 -0500
Luiz Capitulino <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 21:16:30 +0100
> Andreas Färber <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Soramichi-san,
> > 
> > Am 27.01.2014 11:46, schrieb Soramichi AKIYAMA:
> > > This patch fixes a timing issue that migrate command (without -d) does 
> > > not block in some cases.
> > > The original version of hmp.c:hmp_migrate_status_cb checks if the 
> > > migration status is 'active' or not to detect the complition of a 
> > > migration.
> > > However, if this function is executed when the migration status is still 
> > > 'setup' (the status before 'active'),
> > > migration command returns immediately even if the user does not specify 
> > > -d option.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Soramichi Akiyama <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > >  hmp.c |    2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/hmp.c b/hmp.c
> > > index 1af0809..eb887bf 100644
> > > --- a/hmp.c
> > > +++ b/hmp.c
> > > @@ -1234,7 +1234,7 @@ static void hmp_migrate_status_cb(void *opaque)
> > >      MigrationInfo *info;
> > >  
> > >      info = qmp_query_migrate(NULL);
> > > -    if (!info->has_status || strcmp(info->status, "active") == 0) {
> > > +    if (!info->has_status || strcmp(info->status, "active") == 0 || 
> > > strcmp(info->status, "setup") == 0 ) {
> > >          if (info->has_disk) {
> > >              int progress;
> > >  
> > 
> > There's an extra space before the parenthesis. Also please limit patches
> > to 78 characters for code and 76 characters for the commit message in
> > the future.
> 
> I can fix that myself this time (already fixed the log message anyway).

Thank you for the review and sorry for the extra space and the too long lines.
I will obey the rules next time.

-- 
Soramichi AKIYAMA <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]