qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL] VirtFS update


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL] VirtFS update
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:43:49 +0000

On 10 February 2014 19:21, Andreas Färber <address@hidden> wrote:
> Please remember to label the pull request [PULL 0/m] and to thread the
> actual commits as [PULL n/m]. We had to adopt our scripts, too.
>
> Peter, please either enforce those rules or drop them for all of us!

My workflow for applying pull requests doesn't technically
require this or check for it, and so I'm not going to
"enforce" this, since I might well not notice (and in this
case didn't). The rule is not for my benefit when applying
pulls, but for people who might be CC'd on patches forming
part of a pull request and who would otherwise not be able
to tell whether they could reasonably ignore them.

As usual we should:
(a) document our best practice:
 http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPullRequest
(b) politely nudge people if they have not followed it
 (and anybody who is adversely affected should feel free
 to do that; I don't have any particular greater standing
 here than you do); since this is pretty much always simply
 an occasional contributor who wasn't aware of something,
 a gentle nudge should be sufficient
(c) be open to reconsidering our practices if on balance the
 burden turns out to be greater than the benefit. (In this
 case personally I think the rule is a useful one.)

It's inevitably the case that some of our process isn't
enforced by technical means and so there will be occasional
accidental violations; we should in general assume good
faith. I'm not going to punitively refuse to apply pull
requests simply because they don't meet every detail of
what we prefer to do (though of course I will and
already have refused pulls which fail on significant points
like lack of signoff or review).

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]