qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] seccomp: add timerfd_create and timerfd_settime


From: Eduardo Otubo
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] seccomp: add timerfd_create and timerfd_settime to the whitelist
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:00:56 -0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131028 Thunderbird/17.0.10



On 01/26/2014 10:21 AM, Felix Geyer wrote:
libusb calls timerfd_create() and timerfd_settime() when it's built with
timerfd support.

Command to reproduce:

qemu -sandbox on -monitor stdio -device piix3-usb-uhci,id=usb
      -device usb-host,hostbus=1,hostaddr=3,id=hostdev0

Log messages:

audit(1390730418.924:135): auid=4294967295 uid=121 gid=103 ses=4294967295
                            pid=5232 comm="qemu-system-x86" sig=31 syscall=283
                            compat=0 ip=0x7f2b0f4e96a7 code=0x0
audit(1390733100.580:142): auid=4294967295 uid=121 gid=103 ses=4294967295
                            pid=16909 comm="qemu-system-x86" sig=31 syscall=286
                            compat=0 ip=0x7f03513a06da code=0x0

Signed-off-by: Felix Geyer <address@hidden>
---
  qemu-seccomp.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/qemu-seccomp.c b/qemu-seccomp.c
index caa926e..2705468 100644
--- a/qemu-seccomp.c
+++ b/qemu-seccomp.c
@@ -225,7 +225,9 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall seccomp_whitelist[] 
= {
      { SCMP_SYS(fchmod), 240 },
      { SCMP_SYS(shmget), 240 },
      { SCMP_SYS(shmat), 240 },
-    { SCMP_SYS(shmdt), 240 }
+    { SCMP_SYS(shmdt), 240 },
+    { SCMP_SYS(timerfd_create), 240 },
+    { SCMP_SYS(timerfd_settime), 240 }

Did you deliberately set the priority to 240? Or did you run any sort of benchmark (strace) to find this value?

Regards,

--
Eduardo Otubo
IBM Linux Technology Center




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]