Re: [Qemu-devel] How to introduce bs->node_name ?

[Luiz Capitulino]

On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:25:35 -0600
Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 10/30/2013 07:49 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> 
> > 
> > The first proposal is to add another parameter, say "id".  Users can
> > then refer either to an arbitrary BDS by "id", or (for backward
> > compatibility) to the root BDS by "device".  When the code sees
> > "device", it'll look up the BB, then fetch its root BDS.
> > 
> > CON: Existing parameter "device" becomes compatibility cruft.
> > 
> > PRO: Clean and obvious semantics (in my opinion).
> 
> I like this one as well.

Does this proposal makes "device" optional for existing commands? If it
does then I'm afraid it breaks compatibility because if you don't
specify a device you'll get an error today.

Have you considered adding new commands instead?

> > I think we should review with the QMP schema first, code second.
> 
> Yes, get the interface right, and then it's easier to review the code
> that implements the interface.

Agreed.