qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] eepro100: fix simplified mode


From: Stefan Weil
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] eepro100: fix simplified mode
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:43:14 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0

Am 27.09.2013 12:02, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 24/07/2012 09:49, christian schilling ha scritto:
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Stefan Weil <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Am 23.07.2012 11:25, schrieb address@hidden:
>>>> A driver using simplified mode that works on real hardware
>>>> did not work in qemu.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Schilling <address@hidden>
>>>> ---
>>>>   hw/eepro100.c |    7 +++++++
>>>>   1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Do you really think that's a trivial patch?
>> It's only three lines plus comments, but ok small != trivial.
>>
>>> I have a different fix for simplified mode in my QEMU tree:
>>>
>>> http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/ar7.git/blob/HEAD:/hw/eepro100.c
>>>
>>> That version is implemented according to the Intel specifications
>>> and avoids hacks for specific guest drivers.
>> My fix isn't a hack for a specific guest driver, but is also in
>> accordance with the
>> intel specs.
>>
>>> Maybe you can give it a try.
>> I have, it does work.
>> Overall the code look better to me, but one thing irritates me:
>> The comment on line 821 contradicts the trace on 830 and 833.
>> in fact i don't understand the code from 820 to 340. It seems to me it should
>> handle extended flexible TCBs, but if it does what does the code
>> following line 855 do?
> Anything new about this one-year-old patch?
>
> Paolo

No, there isn't, sorry. I still have to send a patch which merges my
modifications into official QEMU.
And I also still wish a good set of test cases which can be used for all
nic emulations.

My version of eepro100.c is in http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/ar7.git.

Regards,
Stefan




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]