qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 12/12] block/get_block_status: fix BDRV_BLOCK_ZE


From: Peter Lieven
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 12/12] block/get_block_status: fix BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO for unallocated blocks
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 07:47:28 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130804 Thunderbird/17.0.8

On 13.09.2013 12:25, Peter Lieven wrote:
this patch does 2 things:
a) only do additional call outs if BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO is not already set.
b) use bdi.discard_zeroes to return the zero state of an unallocated block.
    the callout to bdrv_has_zero_init() is only valid right after bdrv_create.

Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <address@hidden>
---
  block.c |    6 ++++--
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
index 282943b..6698c10 100644
--- a/block.c
+++ b/block.c
@@ -3153,8 +3153,10 @@ static int64_t coroutine_fn 
bdrv_co_get_block_status(BlockDriverState *bs,
          return ret;
      }
- if (!(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_DATA)) {
-        if (bdrv_has_zero_init(bs)) {
+    if (!(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_DATA) && !(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO)) {
+        BlockDriverInfo bdi;
+        if (bdrv_get_info(bs, &bdi) == 0 &&
+            bdi.discard_zeroes) {
              ret |= BDRV_BLOCK_ZERO;
          } else if (bs->backing_hd) {
              BlockDriverState *bs2 = bs->backing_hd;
Kevin, according to your comment that we need a separate function like
bdrv_has_discard_zeroes. It should also be ok to change the order and
first check for bs->backing_hd here or not?

Peter




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]