qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] hw/loader: Support ramdisk with u-boot h


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] hw/loader: Support ramdisk with u-boot header
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:46:57 +0100

On 19 July 2013 18:39, Sören Brinkmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 01:04:20PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 8 July 2013 23:40, Soren Brinkmann <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > +
>> > +        if (ep) {
>> > +            *ep = hdr->ih_ep;
>> > +        }
>>
>> (Allowing ep to be NULL for IH_TYPE_KERNEL is new behaviour,
>> but it makes sense for consistency with the other pointer
>> argument handling.)
>>
>> > +
>> > +        /* TODO: Check CPU type.  */
>> > +        if (is_linux) {
>> > +            if (hdr->ih_os == IH_OS_LINUX) {
>> > +                *is_linux = 1;
>> > +            } else {
>> > +                *is_linux = 0;
>> > +            }
>> > +        }
>> > +
>> > +        break;
>> > +    case IH_TYPE_RAMDISK:
>> > +        address = *loadaddr;
>>
>> This is inconsistent -- for IH_TYPE_KERNEL we accept
>> a NULL loadaddr, but for IH_TYPE_RAMDISK we don't.
> The thing is in case of a ramdisk, it's a mandatory input argument which has
> to be provided, whereas for the kernel, it's an optional output value.
> And other than the load_ramdisk() and load_kernel() routines nobody is
> supposed to call this function directly, IMHO. And I think plausibility
> checks should be done in those routines when possible. And
> load_ramdisk() ensures that the loadaddr pointer is valid.

Well, by that argument you shouldn't introduce the "allow
ep to be NULL" change...

> What would be your suggested change?

I don't mind as long as we're consistent one way or the other
about whether non-optional pointer arguments are checked for
NULL.

-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]