qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] qemu-img: conditionally discard target on c


From: Peter Lieven
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] qemu-img: conditionally discard target on convert
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:53:46 +0200


Am 17.07.2013 um 17:12 schrieb Kevin Wolf <address@hidden>:

> Am 17.07.2013 um 16:53 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
>> Il 17/07/2013 16:46, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>> 
>>> Am 17.07.2013 um 16:26 schrieb Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>:
>>> 
>>>> Il 17/07/2013 16:18, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>>>>>>>> That would be ok if the patches are merged first. Otherwise I could 
>>>>>>>>> ask Kevin
>>>>>>>>> to merge my old series (except the iscsi_co_write_zeroes patch as 
>>>>>>>>> there
>>>>>>>>> obviously is still room for discussion and improvement) and you could 
>>>>>>>>> tweak
>>>>>>>>> iscsi_co_is_allocated later?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'll look at your old series, I think the conflicts are relatively
>>>>>>> trivial.  But I think that this series must wait for 1.7.
>>>>> Would it be an Option to merge it except for the iscsi_co_is_allocated 
>>>>> and the iscsi_co_write_zeroes patch. 3 of the Patches fix potential bugs.
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, of course!  And I think I can merge them via scsi/next, too.  What
>>>> patches are you thinking of exactly?  Can you write the numbers?
>>> 
>>> Mandatory:
>>> [PATCHv3 07/10] iscsi: fix -ENOSPC in iscsi_create()
>>> [PATCHv3 08/10] iscsi: factor out sector conversions
>>> [PATCHv3 09/10] iscsi: remove support for misaligned nb_sectors in aio_readv
>>> [PATCHv3 10/10] iscsi: assert that sectors are aligned to LUN blocksize
>> 
>> Applied all to scsi-next (trivial conflict in patches 8 and 10, solved
>> them myself---just be careful when rebasing).
>> 
>>> Optional (non-conflicting patches):
>>> [PATCHv3 01/10] iscsi: add logical block provisioning information to 
>>> iscsilun
>>> [PATCHv3 05/10] block: add bdrv_write_zeroes()
>>> [PATCHv3 06/10] block/raw: add bdrv_co_write_zeroes
>> 
>> 5 and 6 must go through Kevin.
> 
> This week is Stefan's.
> 
> But didn't I give a Reviewed-by for an earlier version of these patches,
> Peter? It doesn't seem to have made its way to the commit message.
> 
> Kevin

Yes, you did. Sorry i Misses them in V3


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]