qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/32] KVM: Don't assume that mpstate exists with in


From: Alexander Graf
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/32] KVM: Don't assume that mpstate exists with in-kernel PIC always
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 03:44:38 +0200

On PPC, we don't support MP state. So far it's not necessary and I'm
not convinced yet that we really need to support it ever.

However, the current idle logic in QEMU assumes that an in-kernel PIC
also means we support MP state. This assumption is not true anymore.

Let's split up the two cases into two different variables. That way
PPC can expose an in-kernel PIC, while not implementing MP state.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <address@hidden>
CC: Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>
---
 cpus.c               |  2 +-
 include/sysemu/kvm.h | 10 ++++++++++
 kvm-all.c            |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/cpus.c b/cpus.c
index 86571f9..20958e5 100644
--- a/cpus.c
+++ b/cpus.c
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static bool cpu_thread_is_idle(CPUState *cpu)
         return true;
     }
     if (!cpu->halted || qemu_cpu_has_work(cpu) ||
-        kvm_async_interrupts_enabled()) {
+        kvm_halt_in_kernel()) {
         return false;
     }
     return true;
diff --git a/include/sysemu/kvm.h b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
index fe8bc40..24c8e95 100644
--- a/include/sysemu/kvm.h
+++ b/include/sysemu/kvm.h
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
 extern bool kvm_allowed;
 extern bool kvm_kernel_irqchip;
 extern bool kvm_async_interrupts_allowed;
+extern bool kvm_halt_in_kernel_allowed;
 extern bool kvm_irqfds_allowed;
 extern bool kvm_msi_via_irqfd_allowed;
 extern bool kvm_gsi_routing_allowed;
@@ -73,6 +74,14 @@ extern bool kvm_readonly_mem_allowed;
 #define kvm_async_interrupts_enabled() (kvm_async_interrupts_allowed)
 
 /**
+ * kvm_halt_in_kernel
+ *
+ * Returns: true if halted cpus should still get a KVM_RUN ioctl to run
+ * inside of kernel space. This only works if MP state is implemented.
+ */
+#define kvm_halt_in_kernel() (kvm_halt_in_kernel_allowed)
+
+/**
  * kvm_irqfds_enabled:
  *
  * Returns: true if we can use irqfds to inject interrupts into
@@ -110,6 +119,7 @@ extern bool kvm_readonly_mem_allowed;
 #define kvm_enabled()           (0)
 #define kvm_irqchip_in_kernel() (false)
 #define kvm_async_interrupts_enabled() (false)
+#define kvm_halt_in_kernel() (false)
 #define kvm_irqfds_enabled() (false)
 #define kvm_msi_via_irqfd_enabled() (false)
 #define kvm_gsi_routing_allowed() (false)
diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
index 7a1684e..82ecebb 100644
--- a/kvm-all.c
+++ b/kvm-all.c
@@ -107,6 +107,7 @@ struct KVMState
 KVMState *kvm_state;
 bool kvm_kernel_irqchip;
 bool kvm_async_interrupts_allowed;
+bool kvm_halt_in_kernel_allowed;
 bool kvm_irqfds_allowed;
 bool kvm_msi_via_irqfd_allowed;
 bool kvm_gsi_routing_allowed;
@@ -1303,6 +1304,7 @@ static int kvm_irqchip_create(KVMState *s)
      * interrupt delivery (though the reverse is not necessarily true)
      */
     kvm_async_interrupts_allowed = true;
+    kvm_halt_in_kernel_allowed = true;
 
     kvm_init_irq_routing(s);
 
-- 
1.8.1.4




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]