qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/15] target-i386: convert 'hv_spinlocks' to st


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/15] target-i386: convert 'hv_spinlocks' to static property
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:30:40 +0200

On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:34:44 -0300
Eduardo Habkost <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 05:30:50PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 03:18:41PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > [...]
> > > @@ -1632,6 +1677,7 @@ static void cpu_x86_parse_featurestr(X86CPU *cpu, 
> > > char *features, Error **errp)
> > >              } else if (!strcmp(featurestr, "hv-spinlocks")) {
> > >                  char *err;
> > >                  const int min = 0xFFF;
> > > +                char num[32];
> > >                  numvalue = strtoul(val, &err, 0);
> > >                  if (!*val || *err) {
> > >                      error_setg(errp, "bad numerical value %s", val);
> > > @@ -1643,7 +1689,8 @@ static void cpu_x86_parse_featurestr(X86CPU *cpu, 
> > > char *features, Error **errp)
> > >                              min);
> > >                      numvalue = min;
> > >                  }
> > > -                env->hyperv_spinlock_attempts = numvalue;
> > > +                snprintf(num, sizeof(num), "%" PRId32, numvalue);
> > > +                object_property_parse(OBJECT(cpu), num, featurestr, 
> > > errp);
> > 
> > Why not use object_property_set_int()?
> 
> Oh, I believe I have asked that before and you have already explained
> it: you are using strings to allow the existing object_property_parse()
> calls to be easily converted to qdev_prop_register_global() calls later.
> Correct?
> 

Yep, this will be used later to consolidate code.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]