Re: [Qemu-devel] pending 1.5 patches

[Paolo Bonzini]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Il 20/05/2013 17:07, Eric Blake ha scritto:
> On 05/20/2013 05:00 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> I see the following patches on the list that IMO deserve
>> inclusion into 1.5.  All of them should be low-risk.
>> 
>> <address@hidden> [PATCH v2]
>> Rename hexdump to avoid FreeBSD libutil conflict
>> 
>> <address@hidden> [PATCH
>> for-1.5 resend] vl: new runstate transition: 
>> RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED -> RUN_STATE_FINISH_MIGRATE
>> 
>> <address@hidden> [PATCH
>> for-1.5] osdep: fix qemu_anon_ram_free trace (+ fix compilation 
>> on 32 bit hosts)
>> 
>> <address@hidden> 
>> [PATCH 1/3] chardev: Make consistent with udp device for new qapi
>> backend (not the rest of the series)
> 
> Actually, I argue that patch 2/3 of that series would also be an
> ABI change if it is not included NOW, since it renames a union
> member that to date has not been released.

As written, patch 2/3 is an ABI change compared to 1.4, so it cannot
go in anyway, at least not in this shape.

Paolo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=aOgl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----