qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qapi: add struct strList and visit_type_strL


From: Amos Kong
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qapi: add struct strList and visit_type_strList()
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:12:19 +0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Hi Michael,

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:46:25AM -0500, mdroth wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:08:05AM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
> > Currently we can only use ['String'] to add string to a list,
> > it contains some additional JSON structure.
> >     "multicast": [
> >         {
> >             "str": "01:80:c2:00:00:21"
> >         },
> >         {
> >             "str": "00:00:00:00:00:00"
> >         }
> >     ]
> > 
> > This patch adds struct strList and visit function, we can use ['str'] in
> > schema file.
> > 
> >     "multicast": [
> >         "01:00:5e:00:00:01",
> >         "33:33:ff:12:34:57"
> >     ]
> > 
> > V2: remove ugly #ifndef, add forward declaration in qapi-types.h,
> >     and define the struct in include/qapi/visitor.h (Paolo)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Amos Kong <address@hidden>
> 
> Sorry for the delay in getting back to you, I started to respond last
> week and ended up hacking something up that take a different approach.
> 
> Namely: we don't hardcode visit_type_strList(), but instead teach the
> qapi code generators about native types we currently allow in schemas
> ('str', 'int', 'number', 'bool') and have them handle code generation
> for these like they would for any user-defined type.

It's better.
 
> This approach works too, but I think this solution is more complete.
> I'm still working out some bits with the unit tests but I've pushed my
> WIP here for reference:
> 
> https://github.com/mdroth/qemu/commits/qapi-native-lists
> 
> Please give that a shot.

Your patchset looks good to me, I only added some trivial comments on
github.

-- 
                        Amos.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]