[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Use of flash for x86 BIOS
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Use of flash for x86 BIOS |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Mar 2013 19:51:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) |
Peter Maydell <address@hidden> writes:
> On 21 March 2013 07:45, Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
>> [Note cc: Jordan, who added flash to x86 in commit bd183c79]
>>
>> Peter Maydell <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> These patches implement migration support for pflash_cfi01.
>>> The first patch just drops some useless state so we don't
>>> have to think about it for migration.
>>>
>>> NB that pflash_cfi01 is used in the x86 pc model. I think this
>>> means that migration while the BIOS is accessing the flash
>>> wouldn't have worked properly. Since migration from a device
>>> with no vmstate to one with vmstate works OK this shouldn't
>>> break cross-version migration. However x86 maintainers may
>>> wish to review and confirm this for themselves...
>>
>> x86 maintainers may wish to *switch it off* until it's done fully and
>> properly, by setting "pc-sysfw" property "rom_only" to 1.
>
> So does that mean that these patches can't be applied until
> the rom_only property is set, or is that a fix that can be made
> independently?
If your patches work, then applying them can't make things worse for x86
than they already are, can it? Thus, independent, I guess.