qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] TCG broken in system mode (was TCG assertion with qemu-


From: Aurélien Jarno
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] TCG broken in system mode (was TCG assertion with qemu-system-mipsel)
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 23:27:47 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 07:10:17AM +0100, Aurélien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 11:05:15AM +0900, Yeongkyoon Lee wrote:
> > On 03/05/2013 11:18 PM, Aurélien Jarno wrote:
> > >On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:37:31PM +0100, Aurélien Jarno wrote:
> > >>Hi,
> > >>
> > >>On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 11:10:18PM +0100, Stefan Weil wrote:
> > >>>This assertion occured with latest git master:
> > >>>
> > >>>qemu-system-mipsel: /src/qemu/tcg/tcg-op.h:2589:
> > >>>  tcg_gen_goto_tb: Assertion `(tcg_ctx.goto_tb_issue_mask & (1 << idx))
> > >>>== 0' failed.
> > >>>Aborted
> > >>>
> > >>>QEMU was built with --enable-debug and running a Debian MIPS Lenny (NFS
> > >>>root).
> > >>>The assertion happened when running "apt-get update" in the guest.
> > >>>
> > >>Is it something reproductible or more or less random? Have you Cc:ed
> > >>Richard because it's related to the latest patches?
> > >>
> > >>On my side I am experiencing random segfaults in various guests (at
> > >>least PowerPC, MIPS, SH4 and ARM). I have found a way to bisect it, even
> > >>if it is quite long (building Perl + the testsuite). Currently I know
> > >>that 1.3 is affected, while 1.2 is not.
> > >>
> > >I have found that the issue comes from the following commits, which
> > >unfortunately are not bisectable one by one (though it won't change the
> > >results a lot):
> > >
> > >     commit b76f0d8c2e3eac94bc7fd90a510cb7426b2a2699
> > >     Author: Yeongkyoon Lee <address@hidden>
> > >     Date:   Wed Oct 31 16:04:25 2012 +0900
> > >         tcg: Optimize qemu_ld/st by generating slow paths at the end of a 
> > > block
> > >         Add optimized TCG qemu_ld/st generation which locates the code of 
> > > TLB miss
> > >         cases at the end of a block after generating the other IRs.
> > >         Currently, this optimization supports only i386 and x86_64 hosts.
> > >         Signed-off-by: Yeongkyoon Lee <address@hidden>
> > >         Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <address@hidden>
> > >     commit fdbb84d1332ae0827d60f1a2ca03c7d5678c6edd
> > >     Author: Yeongkyoon Lee <address@hidden>
> > >     Date:   Wed Oct 31 16:04:24 2012 +0900
> > >         tcg: Add extended GETPC mechanism for MMU helpers with ldst 
> > > optimization
> > >         Add GETPC_EXT which is used by MMU helpers to selectively 
> > > calculate the code
> > >         address of accessing guest memory when called from a qemu_ld/st 
> > > optimized code
> > >         or a C function. Currently, it supports only i386 and x86-64 
> > > hosts.
> > >         Signed-off-by: Yeongkyoon Lee <address@hidden>
> > >         Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <address@hidden>
> > >     commit 32761257c0b9fa7ee04d2871a6e48a41f119c469
> > >     Author: Yeongkyoon Lee <address@hidden>
> > >     Date:   Wed Oct 31 16:04:23 2012 +0900
> > >         configure: Add CONFIG_QEMU_LDST_OPTIMIZATION for TCG qemu_ld/st 
> > > optimization
> > >         Enable CONFIG_QEMU_LDST_OPTIMIZATION for TCG qemu_ld/st 
> > > optimization only when
> > >         a host is i386 or x86_64.
> > >         Signed-off-by: Yeongkyoon Lee <address@hidden>
> > >         Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <address@hidden>
> > >
> > >I will try to understand why.
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > Hi Aurélien,
> > Do you mean that those random segfaults occurred only when
> > configured with "--enable-debug"?
> > Although I cannot see how my commits affect debug built image at a
> > glance, I'll do double-check.
> > Thanks.
> 
> The problem is there even without configuring QEMU with --enable-debug.
> It justs doesn't happens very often, and very randomly. The only way to
> reproduce it each time is to launch a big task in the guest (for me
> building Perl) and see if it completes or now. It can take up to one
> hour until it happens.
> 
> I should precise that the segfault is on the guest side.
> 
> I have tried to look at your patches, and so far I haven't found the
> issue. It seems the two first patches are fine, ie I have verified the
> return address is always correctly computed.
> 

I still haven't found the issue, but on the other hand I can't find any
problem in your code, after reading it dozen of times. I also tried to
modify it as less as possible while issuing the slow path back inside
the TB and it fixes the problem. So it really looks like to be due to
the slow path being at the end of the TB, and not to a bug in the code
generating it. After adding various checks, I am also convinced the
address computed in GETPC_EXT() is always correct. I have to say I am
running out of ideas.

One way to reproduce the issue more easily is to reduce the size of the
generated code buffer, for example by setting it to 512kB for both
MIN_CODE_GEN_BUFFER_SIZE and MAX_CODE_GEN_BUFFER_SIZE in
translate-all.c. That way booting an ARM guest triggers plenty of
segmentation faults or other strange issues with your patch but not
without.

OTOH increasing this size make the issue to almost disappear even when
building perl including the testsuite (for that it has to be at least
512MB).

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
address@hidden                 http://www.aurel32.net



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]