[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Proposal for hw/ split
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Proposal for hw/ split |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:12:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130219 Thunderbird/17.0.3 |
Il 11/03/2013 14:08, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>>>> >>> These are little more than SoC containers, aren't they?
>>> >>
>>> >> They're container devices, yes. But why should container devices
>>> >> go under hw/$ARCH ?
>> >
>> > Because they don't really implement any logic, ideally a board should be
>> > a little more than a bunch of container devices.
> This is an argument for putting boards in the same place as
> container devices (which I would agree with), not for putting
> container devices in the same place we currently put boards
> (which I would disagree with).
True. Still, hw/ARCH is a pretty decent place for boards (and in fact
it was part of "part 1" because it was more or less agreed-upon).
Paolo
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Proposal for hw/ split, Edgar E. Iglesias, 2013/03/11
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Proposal for hw/ split, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2013/03/11
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Proposal for hw/ split, Richard Henderson, 2013/03/12