qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Add GDB qAttached support


From: Jan Kiszka
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Add GDB qAttached support
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:36:24 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

On 2013-03-11 12:22, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
> On 03/10/2013 09:06 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> @@ -2491,6 +2493,10 @@ static int gdb_handle_packet(GDBState *s, const char 
>>> *line_buf)
>>>              break;
>>>          }
>>>  #endif
>>> +        if (strncmp(p, "Attached", 8) == 0) {
>>> +            put_packet(s, gdb_attached ? "1" : "0");
>>> +            break;
>>> +        }
>>
>> This works as expected for system mode, but now inverts the behaviour
>> for user mode - that's unexpected and not ok.
>>
> 
> OK, I can change the default value for user mode.
> 
>>> diff --git a/qemu-options.hx b/qemu-options.hx
>>> index 6f9334a..026d3eb 100644
>>> --- a/qemu-options.hx
>>> +++ b/qemu-options.hx
>>> @@ -2988,6 +2988,13 @@ property must be set.  These objects are placed in 
>>> the
>>>  '/objects' path.
>>>  ETEXI
>>>
>>> +DEF("gdb-not-attached", 0, QEMU_OPTION_gdb_not_attached,
>>> +    "-gdb-not-attached\n"
>>> +    "                Do not set Gdb remote server in attached mode.\n"
>>> +    "                When exiting debugging session, Gdb will send a 
>>> 'kill'\n"
>>> +    "                command instead of a 'detach'.\n",
>>> +    QEMU_ARCH_ALL)
>>> +
>>
>> First of all, why do we need this configurable? In which use cases do
>> you want attached mode for user emulation or kill mode for system
>> emulation/virtualization?
>>
> 
> It's more convenient for us, we expect QEMU to terminate at the end of
> debugging session because we do not run big systems/kernels but short
> test programs. It used to be the default behavior of QEMU, and our
> test-suites, IDE, developers and users are expecting this.

And it's not possible to replace 'q' with 'k' in your gdb control
scripts? That gives you a well-defined behaviour, and we don't need to
tweak QEMU, specifically its command line, for this special case.

Jan


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]