qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] 9pfs segfaults on chmod(special)


From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] 9pfs segfaults on chmod(special)
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 14:42:51 +0530
User-agent: Notmuch/0.15.1+22~gc34effa (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)

Michael Tokarev <address@hidden> writes:

> When guest tries to chmod a block or char device file over 9pfs,
> the qemu process segfaults.
>
> On host:
>  qemu-system-x86_64 -virtfs 
> local,path=/dev,security_model=mapped-file,mount_tag=tag
>
> On guest:
>  mount -t 9p -o trans=virtio tag /mnt
>  chmod 0777 /mnt/tty

any specific reason why you are trying 9p .u ?

>
> Result (for 1.4.0):
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x566095af in v9mode_to_mode (mode=8389101, extension=0xc7584ef8)
>     at /build/kvm/git/hw/9pfs/virtio-9p.c:662
> 662           if (extension && extension->data[0] == 'c') {
> (gdb) p *extension
> $1 = {size = 0, data = 0x0}
> (gdb) bt
> #0  0x566095af in v9mode_to_mode (mode=8389101, extension=0xc7584ef8)
>     at hw/9pfs/virtio-9p.c:662
> #1  0x5660f38b in v9fs_wstat (opaque=0xd250945c)
>     at hw/9pfs/virtio-9p.c:2635
> (gdb) frame 1
> #1  0x5660f38b in v9fs_wstat (opaque=0xd250945c)
>     at hw/9pfs/virtio-9p.c:2635
> 2635          err = v9fs_co_chmod(pdu, &fidp->path,
>                             v9mode_to_mode(v9stat.mode,
>                                            &v9stat.extension));
> (gdb) p v9stat
> $2 = {size = 61, type = -1, dev = -1, qid = {type = -1 '\377', version = -1,
>     path = -1}, mode = 8389101, atime = -1, mtime = -1, length = -1, name = {
>     size = 0, data = 0x0}, uid = {size = 0, data = 0x0}, gid = {size = 0,
>     data = 0x0}, muid = {size = 0, data = 0x0}, extension = {size = 0,
>     data = 0x0}, n_uid = -1, n_gid = -1, n_muid = -1}
>
>
> Corresponding code in v9mode_to_mode():
>
>      if (mode & P9_STAT_MODE_DEVICE) {
>          if (extension && extension->data[0] == 'c') {
>              ret |= S_IFCHR;
>          } else {
>              ret |= S_IFBLK;
>      }
>
> This (static) function (v9mode_to_mode) is called from only one place,
> namely from v9fs_wstat(), and it always calls it with non-NULL
> `extension' argument: &v9stat.extension.
>
> Maybe the buffer (extension->data) should be passed to it instead of
> the whole structure (extension)?  Or the check be extended (or,
> since this function isn't called from any other place, _replaced_) to
> test for non-NULL ->data too?
>

Thanks for the detailed analysis. Something like below ?

diff --git a/hw/9pfs/virtio-9p.c b/hw/9pfs/virtio-9p.c
index f526467..073067f 100644
--- a/hw/9pfs/virtio-9p.c
+++ b/hw/9pfs/virtio-9p.c
@@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static mode_t v9mode_to_mode(uint32_t mode, V9fsString 
*extension)
         ret |= S_IFIFO;
     }
     if (mode & P9_STAT_MODE_DEVICE) {
-        if (extension && extension->data[0] == 'c') {
+        if (extension->size && extension->data[0] == 'c') {
             ret |= S_IFCHR;
         } else {
             ret |= S_IFBLK;




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]