Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 2/3] target-i386:define hw_{global, local}breakpoint_enabled function

[Andreas Färber]

Am 10.12.2012 03:22, schrieb liguang:
> Signed-off-by: liguang <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target-i386/cpu.h |   15 +++++++++++++--
>  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.h b/target-i386/cpu.h
> index 29245d1..c69f81f 100644
> --- a/target-i386/cpu.h
> +++ b/target-i386/cpu.h
> @@ -996,9 +996,20 @@ int cpu_x86_handle_mmu_fault(CPUX86State *env, 
> target_ulong addr,
>  #define cpu_handle_mmu_fault cpu_x86_handle_mmu_fault
>  void cpu_x86_set_a20(CPUX86State *env, int a20_state);
>  
> -static inline int hw_breakpoint_enabled(unsigned long dr7, int index)
> +static inline bool hw_local_breakpoint_enabled(unsigned long dr7, int index)
>  {
> -    return (dr7 >> (index * 2)) & 3;
> +    return ((dr7 >> (index * 2)) & 1);

There's no need to add parenthesis around this expression.

Shouldn't this ...

> +}
> +
> +static inline bool hw_global_breakpoint_enabled(unsigned long dr7, int index)
> +{
> +    return ((dr7 >> (index * 2)) & 2);

... and this use defines from 1/3 now rather than magic numbers?

Otherwise the logic seems to match what was discussed.

Andreas

> +}
> +
> +static inline bool hw_breakpoint_enabled(unsigned long dr7, int index)
> +{
> +    return (hw_global_breakpoint_enabled(dr7, index) ||
> +            hw_local_breakpoint_enabled(dr7, index));
>  }
>  
>  static inline int hw_breakpoint_type(unsigned long dr7, int index)

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg