qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: init bs->io_base correctly to avoid lock


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: init bs->io_base correctly to avoid locking
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:55:23 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0

Il 10/01/2013 11:45, Markus Armbruster ha scritto:
> 
>> > If io_limits are specified during runtime that exceed the number of 
>> > operations in flight
>> > bs->io_base is not initialized in the else statement in 
>> > bdrv_exceed_io_limits().
> I'm confused.
> 
>     if ((bs->slice_start < now)
>         && (bs->slice_end > now)) {
>         bs->slice_end = now + bs->slice_time;
>     } else {
>         bs->slice_time  =  5 * BLOCK_IO_SLICE_TIME;
>         bs->slice_start = now;
>         bs->slice_end   = now + bs->slice_time;
> 
>         bs->io_base.bytes[is_write]  = bs->nr_bytes[is_write];
>         bs->io_base.bytes[!is_write] = bs->nr_bytes[!is_write];
> 
>         bs->io_base.ios[is_write]    = bs->nr_ops[is_write];
>         bs->io_base.ios[!is_write]   = bs->nr_ops[!is_write];
>     }

bdrv_io_limits_enable correctly starts a new slice (the first three
lines of the else), but does not set io_base correctly for that slice.
Here is how io_base is used:

    bytes_base  = bs->nr_bytes[is_write] - bs->io_base.bytes[is_write];
    bytes_res   = (unsigned) nb_sectors * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE;

    if (bytes_base + bytes_res <= bytes_limit) {
        /* no wait */
    } else {
        /* operation needs to be throttled */
    }

As a result, any I/O operations that are triggered between now and
bs->slice_end are incorrectly limited.  If 10 MB of data has been
written since the VM was started, QEMU thinks that 10 MB of data has
been written in this slice.

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]