qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [ [PATCH 1/2] cutils:change strtosz_suffix_unit functio


From: Igor Mammedov
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [ [PATCH 1/2] cutils:change strtosz_suffix_unit function
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:11:06 +0100

On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 09:03:50 +0100
Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:

> Igor Mammedov <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, 7 Dec 2012 11:49:49 +0800
> > liguang <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> if value to be translated is larger than INT64_MAX,
> >> this function will not be convenient for caller to
> >> be aware of it, so change a little for this.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: liguang <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >>  cutils.c |    5 +++--
> >>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/cutils.c b/cutils.c
> >> index 4f0692f..8905b5e 100644
> >> --- a/cutils.c
> >> +++ b/cutils.c
> >> @@ -219,11 +219,11 @@ static int64_t suffix_mul(char suffix, int64_t unit)
> >>  int64_t strtosz_suffix_unit(const char *nptr, char **end,
> >>                              const char default_suffix, int64_t unit)
> >>  {
> >> -    int64_t retval = -1;
> >> +    int64_t retval = -1, mul;
> >>      char *endptr;
> >>      unsigned char c;
> >>      int mul_required = 0;
> >> -    double val, mul, integral, fraction;
> >> +    double val, integral, fraction;
> >>  
> >>      errno = 0;
> >>      val = strtod(nptr, &endptr);
> >> @@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ int64_t strtosz_suffix_unit(const char *nptr, char
> >> **end, goto fail;
> >>      }
> >>      if ((val * mul >= INT64_MAX) || val < 0) {
> >> +        retval = 0;
> > Why not to add Error argument to return errors instead of using return 
> > value?
> > That way function would be easier to generalize in future to handle whole
> > INT64 range.
> 
> Generalize when you have a user, not earlier.
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/183792

> 
> >              And callers would check only returned error instead of return
> > value or if 'end' == 0. 
> 
> Checking the return value is sufficient now.  What makes you think you
> have to check end, too?
I've meant *endptr == "\0" check in several callers:
opts_type_size(), img_create(), numa_add().


-- 
Regards,
  Igor



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]