[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Testing migration under stress
From: |
Orit Wasserman |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Testing migration under stress |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:21:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121016 Thunderbird/16.0.1 |
On 11/05/2012 02:30 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 02:12:25PM +0200, Orit Wasserman wrote:
>> On 11/02/2012 05:10 AM, David Gibson wrote:
>>> Asking for some advice on the list.
>>>
>>> I have prorotype savevm and migration support ready for the pseries
>>> machine. They seem to work under simple circumstances (idle guest).
>>> To test them more extensively I've been attempting to perform live
>>> migrations (just over tcp->localhost) which the guest is active with
>>> something. In particular I've tried while using octave to do matrix
>>> multiply (so exercising the FP unit) and my colleague Alexey has tried
>>> during some video encoding.
>
>> As you are doing local migration one option is to setting the speed
>> higher than line speed , as we don't actually send the data, another
>> is to set high downtime.
>
> I'm not entirely sure what you mean by that. But I do have suspicions
> based on this and other factors that the default bandwidth it is
> limiting to is horribly, horribly low.
>
>>> However, in each of these cases, we've found that the migration only
>>> completes and the source instance only stops after the intensive
>>> workload has (just) completed. What I surmise is happening is that
>>> the workload is touching memory pages fast enough that the ram
>>> migration code is never getting below the threshold to complete the
>>> migration until the guest is idle again.
>>>
>> The workload you chose is really bad for live migration, as all the
>> guest does is dirtying his memory.
>
> Well, I realised that was true of the matrix multiply. For video
> encode though, the output data should be much, much smaller than the
> input, so I wouldn't expect it to be dirtying memory that fast.
>
>> I recommend looking for workload
>> that does some networking or disk IO. Vinod succeeded running
>> SwingBench and SLOB benchmarks that converged ok, I don't know if
>> they run on pseries, but similar workload should be ok(small
>> database/warehouse). We found out that SpecJbb on the other hand is
>> hard to converge. Web workload or video streaming also do the
>> trick.
>
> Hrm. As something really simple and stupid, I did try migrationg an
> ls -lR /, but even that didn't converge :/.
That is strange, it should converge even with the defaults,
Any special about your storage setup ?
>
Re: [Qemu-devel] Testing migration under stress, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/11/02
Re: [Qemu-devel] Testing migration under stress, Juan Quintela, 2012/11/02