qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Using PCI config space to indicate config location


From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Using PCI config space to indicate config location
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:55:44 -0500
User-agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+93~ged93d79 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)

Gerd Hoffmann <address@hidden> writes:

>   Hi,
>
>>> So we could have for virtio something like this:
>>>
>>>         Capabilities: [??] virtio-regs:
>>>                 legacy: BAR=0 offset=0
>>>                 virtio-pci: BAR=1 offset=1000
>>>                 virtio-cfg: BAR=1 offset=1800
>> 
>> This would be a vendor specific PCI capability so lspci wouldn't
>> automatically know how to parse it.
>
> Sure, would need a patch to actually parse+print the cap,
> /me was just trying to make my point clear in a simple way.
>
>>>>> 2) ISTR an argument about mapping the ISR register separately, for
>>>>>    performance, but I can't find a reference to it.
>>>>
>>>> I think the rationale is that ISR really needs to be PIO but everything
>>>> else doesn't.  PIO is much faster on x86 because it doesn't require
>>>> walking page tables or instruction emulation to handle the exit.
>>>
>>> Is this still a pressing issue?  With MSI-X enabled ISR isn't needed,
>>> correct?  Which would imply that pretty much only old guests without
>>> MSI-X support need this, and we don't need to worry that much when
>>> designing something new ...
>> 
>> It wasn't that long ago that MSI-X wasn't supported..  I think we should
>> continue to keep ISR as PIO as it is a fast path.
>
> No problem if we allow to have both legacy layout and new layout at the
> same time.  Guests can continue to use ISR @ BAR0 in PIO space for
> existing virtio devices, even in case they want use mmio for other
> registers -> all fine.
>
> New virtio devices can support MSI-X from day one and decide to not
> expose a legacy layout PIO bar.

I think having BAR1 be an MMIO mirror of the registers + a BAR2 for
virtio configuration space is probably not that bad of a solution.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

>
> cheers,
>   Gerd
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to address@hidden
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]