qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch 2/6] Use machine options to emulate -no-kvm-irqc


From: Marcelo Tosatti
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch 2/6] Use machine options to emulate -no-kvm-irqchip
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 14:16:52 -0300
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 05:36:38PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 04.10.2012 16:30, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
> > On 2012-10-04 16:21, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> -no-kvm should be included too.
> > 
> > Reminds me that we still need to agree on the final default accel strategy.
> > 
> >>
> >> I just ran across a user that was injecting '-no-kvm-irqchip' in their
> >> libvirt XML via a custom attribute.  It turned out it was to work around
> >> broken MSI support in their funky guest they were running.  It was the
> >> wrong solution to the problem but they were doing it regardless.
> >>
> >> The point is, there are users in the wild using these options.  There's
> >> no reason to remove them if they are trivial to maintain (and they are
> >> in their current form).
> > 
> > So let's define a consistent policy for them all:
> >  - warn on the command line on use
> 
> >  - avoid adding them to the help or other user documentation
> 
> That's dangerous - at some point someone will notice and propose a patch
> documenting them and the reviewers may have forgotten by then why it was
> not documented in the first place. Better clearly document them in help
> output as "DEPRECATED, to be removed in future versions" or so.

Adding the policy to docs/qemukvm-compat-commands-policy.txt should workaround
that problem.

And a friendly text on the announce e-mail.

> Andreas
> 
> >  - keep them until we rework the whole command line
> > 
> > Jan
> > 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]