qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Reduce compaction scanning and lock content


From: Richard Davies
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] Reduce compaction scanning and lock contention
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:49:34 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

Mel Gorman wrote:
> > I did manage to get a couple which were slightly worse, but nothing like as
> > bad as before. Here are the results:
> >
> > # grep -F '[k]' report | head -8
> >     45.60%       qemu-kvm  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] clear_page_c
> >     11.26%       qemu-kvm  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] isolate_freepages_block
> >      3.21%       qemu-kvm  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] _raw_spin_lock
> >      2.27%           ksmd  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] memcmp
> >      2.02%        swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] default_idle
> >      1.58%       qemu-kvm  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] svm_vcpu_run
> >      1.30%       qemu-kvm  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
> >      1.09%       qemu-kvm  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] get_page_from_freelist
> >
> > # grep -F '[k]' report | head -8
> >     61.29%       qemu-kvm  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] clear_page_c
> >      4.52%       qemu-kvm  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
> >      2.64%       qemu-kvm  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] copy_page_c
> >      1.61%        swapper  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] default_idle
> >      1.57%       qemu-kvm  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] _raw_spin_lock
> >      1.18%       qemu-kvm  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] get_page_from_freelist
> >      1.18%       qemu-kvm  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] isolate_freepages_block
> >      1.11%       qemu-kvm  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] svm_vcpu_run
>
> Were the boot times acceptable even when these slightly worse figures
> were recorded?

Yes, they were 10-20% slower as you might expect from the traces, rather
than a factor slower.

> Thank you for the detailed reporting and the testing, it's much
> appreciated. I've already rebased the patches to Andrew's tree and tested
> them overnight and the figures look good on my side. I'll update the
> changelog and push them shortly.

Great. On my side, I'm delighted that senior kernel developers such as you,
Rik and Avi took our bug report seriously and helped fix it!

Thank you,

Richard.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]