[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices
From: |
ching |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Sep 2012 19:34:09 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.6esrpre) Gecko/20120729 Thunderbird/10.0.6 |
On 09/05/2012 02:55 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 05/09/2012 00:13, ching ha scritto:
>>>>>>>> Ah, ok. libvirt for now supports only booting from LUN 0. You can use
> ^^^^^^^
>
> Oops, should have been SeaBIOS.
>
>>>>>>>> multiple targets instead of multiple units.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Paolo
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> it works. thanks a lot.
>>>>>> hope that libvirt will document it somewhere
>>>> Please raise this issue on the libvirt lists, then.
>>>>
>> actually, why is the problem related to libvirt, not qemu, nor seabios?
>>
>> libvirt has generated the qemu command line with "bootindex" already.
> Yes, it's SeaBIOS. It is documented in the code.
>
> Paolo
>
thank you very much for your kindly help.
ching
- Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices, ching, 2012/09/02
- Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/09/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices, ching, 2012/09/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/09/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices, ching, 2012/09/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices, Eric Blake, 2012/09/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices, ching, 2012/09/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/09/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] boot device order has no effect for virtio-scsi devices,
ching <=