[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [RESEND PATCH 1/3] socket: remove redund
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [RESEND PATCH 1/3] socket: remove redundant check |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Aug 2012 13:48:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 04:59:01PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
>> It's aleady in the end of loop, error should be set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amos Kong <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> qemu-sockets.c | 4 +---
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/qemu-sockets.c b/qemu-sockets.c
>> index 668fa93..c636882 100644
>> --- a/qemu-sockets.c
>> +++ b/qemu-sockets.c
>> @@ -181,9 +181,7 @@ int inet_listen_opts(QemuOpts *opts, int port_offset,
>> Error **errp)
>> fprintf(stderr,"%s: bind(%s,%s,%d): %s\n", __FUNCTION__,
>> inet_strfamily(e->ai_family), uaddr,
>> inet_getport(e),
>> strerror(errno));
>> - if (!e->ai_next) {
>> - error_set(errp, QERR_SOCKET_BIND_FAILED);
>> - }
>> + error_set(errp, QERR_SOCKET_BIND_FAILED);
>> }
>> }
>> closesocket(slisten);
>
> This isn't obvious. It looks like the intent of the if (!e->ai_next) is
> to suppress the error so that the next iteration of the *outer* loop can
> succeed.
>
> Why is it okay to set QERR_SOCKET_BIND_FAILED? We may have more
> addrinfos left to try in the outer loop. They may succeed so we don't
> want an error in that case.
You are correct, and the patch is wrong.
See also related
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-02/msg00772.html
Message not available
Message not available