qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 18/32] hd-geometry: Switch to uint32_t to match


From: Blue Swirl
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 18/32] hd-geometry: Switch to uint32_t to match BlockConf
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 19:11:01 +0000

On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Andreas Färber <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Am 02.07.2012 14:55, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>>>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 05:34:40PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>>> Best to use the same type, to avoid unwanted truncation or sign
>>>>> extension.
>>>>>
>>>>> BlockConf can't use plain int for cyls, heads and secs, because
>>>>> integer properties require an exact width.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  blockdev.h       |    2 +-
>>>>>  hw/hd-geometry.c |    4 ++--
>>>>>  hw/ide/core.c    |    2 +-
>>>>>  hw/scsi-disk.c   |    2 +-
>>>>>  hw/virtio-blk.c  |    2 +-
>>>>>  5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> It would be nice to update the hd_geometry_lchs_guess() trace event that
>>>> you added to use uint32_t + %u instead of int + %d.
>>>
>>> PRIu32?
>>
>> uint32_t: Good point, will do.
>>
>> Conversion specifier: trace-events routinely prints uint32_t with %d and
>> %x, never with PRI*32.  I'm happy to change from %d to %u, but reluctant
>> to add the first use of PRIu32.
>
> Either is fine by me although we might as well continue to do %u.

I'd also vote for %u. PRI*32 do not seem very useful compared to plain
int versions.

>
> Stefan
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]