Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] xen_disk: remove syncwrite option

[Kevin Wolf]

Am 24.04.2012 13:55, schrieb Stefano Stabellini:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 24.04.2012 13:22, schrieb Stefano Stabellini:
>>> Use the BDRV_O_CACHE_* flags instead.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <address@hidden>
>>
>> Doesn't apply to qemu.git because...
>>
>>> ---
>>>  hw/xen_disk.c |    8 +-------
>>>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/xen_disk.c b/hw/xen_disk.c
>>> index 4a6d89c..3e4a47b 100644
>>> --- a/hw/xen_disk.c
>>> +++ b/hw/xen_disk.c
>>> @@ -48,7 +48,6 @@
>>>  
>>>  /* ------------------------------------------------------------- */
>>>  
>>> -static int syncwrite    = 0;
>>>  static int batch_maps   = 0;
>>>  
>>>  static int max_requests = 32;
>>> @@ -189,15 +188,10 @@ static int ioreq_parse(struct ioreq *ioreq)
>>>              ioreq->presync = 1;
>>>              return 0;
>>>          }
>>> -        if (!syncwrite) {
>>> -            ioreq->postsync = 1;
>>
>> ...this is ioreq->presync = ioreq->postsync = 1;
> 
> That's because it is based on top of the following two patches:
> 
> xen_disk: use bdrv_aio_flush instead of bdrv_flush
> http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=133434258008959&w=2
> 
> xen_disk: implement BLKIF_OP_FLUSH_DISKCACHE, remove BLKIF_OP_WRITE_BARRIER
> http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=133459581417878&w=2
> 
> I have just sent a pull request for them
> (http://marc.info/?l=qemu-devel&m=133526669019403) after leaving lying
> around for a while.
> Next time do you want me to send xen_disk specific pull request to you
> instead? Sorry if I shouldn't have sent the pull request directly...

I see. I wasn't aware that you're doing pull requests, but it isn't a
problem. It just means that you should probably do a pull request for
this one as well instead of expecting that I pick it up. But you can
have my Acked-by, if you like.

Should I ignore xen_disk patches from now on for the block branch and
assume that you pick them up?

Kevin