qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] ARM: Exynos4210 IRQ: Introduce new IRQ gate


From: Evgeny Voevodin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] ARM: Exynos4210 IRQ: Introduce new IRQ gate functionality.
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 15:51:57 +0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1

On 20.04.2012 15:13, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 17 April 2012 06:41, Evgeny Voevodin<address@hidden>  wrote:
+static Property exynos4210_irq_gate_properties[] = {
+    DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("n_in", Exynos4210IRQGateState, n_in, 1),
+    DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
+};
+
  static const VMStateDescription vmstate_exynos4210_irq_gate = {
     .name = "exynos4210.irq_gate",
-    .version_id = 1,
-    .minimum_version_id = 1,
-    .minimum_version_id_old = 1,
+    .version_id = 2,
+    .minimum_version_id = 2,
+    .minimum_version_id_old = 2,
     .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
-        VMSTATE_UINT32_ARRAY(gpio_level, Exynos4210IRQGateState,
-                EXYNOS4210_IRQ_GATE_NINPUTS),
+        VMSTATE_UINT32(n_in, Exynos4210IRQGateState),
+        VMSTATE_VBUFFER_UINT32(level, Exynos4210IRQGateState, 1, NULL, 0, 
n_in),
         VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
n_in is constant, so you shouldn't need to save/restore it, right?

Oh, seems so. It's not changing during run-time.

Otherwise looks good.

PS: 3 days is a bit eager to be sending pings :-) I'd suggest about
a week as the usual time to leave...

Ok, sorry :)

-- PMM



--
Kind regards,
Evgeny Voevodin,
Leading Software Engineer,
ASWG, Moscow R&D center, Samsung Electronics
e-mail: address@hidden




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]