[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3 |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Apr 2012 09:40:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 |
Il 04/04/2012 03:18, Michael Roth ha scritto:
> Attacking the IDL/schema side first is the more rationale approach. From
> there we can potentially generate ASN.1 BER/DER visitors for the protocol
> side, or potentially even just vmstate bindings as a start. I've recently
> started looking into the latter... it's completely feasible, the only
> downside is it complicates the IDL due requiring support for a lot of
> what are very much vmstate-specific items, but it should be possible to
> do this in a manner where those annotations are self-contained and
> ignorable if we opted to replace vmstate-style declarations.
We can also keep the current vmstate descriptions, but access fields
from the automatically-generated visitors instead of struct fields.
This keeps the IDL simple.
Paolo
- [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3, Markus Armbruster, 2012/04/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3, Dor Laor, 2012/04/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3, Michael Roth, 2012/04/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3, Michael Roth, 2012/04/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3, Igor Mammedov, 2012/04/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3, Michael Roth, 2012/04/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3, Avi Kivity, 2012/04/05
Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3, Anthony Liguori, 2012/04/04