qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] virtio-blk: report non-zero status when fai


From: Orit Wasserman
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] virtio-blk: report non-zero status when failing SG_IO requests
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 15:36:13 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120209 Thunderbird/10.0.1

On 03/07/2012 08:01 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Linux really looks only at scsi->errors.  Arguably it is their bug,
> but we can make it safe for older guests now.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden>
> ---
>  hw/virtio-blk.c |   48 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/virtio-blk.c b/hw/virtio-blk.c
> index 49990f8..b7e510d 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio-blk.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio-blk.c
> @@ -145,20 +145,12 @@ static VirtIOBlockReq 
> *virtio_blk_get_request(VirtIOBlock *s)
>      return req;
>  }
>  
> -#ifdef __linux__
>  static void virtio_blk_handle_scsi(VirtIOBlockReq *req)
>  {
> -    struct sg_io_hdr hdr;
> -    int ret;
> +    int ret = -1;
>      int status;
>      int i;
>  
> -    if ((req->dev->vdev.guest_features & (1 << VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI)) == 0) {
> -        virtio_blk_req_complete(req, VIRTIO_BLK_S_UNSUPP);
> -        g_free(req);
> -        return;
> -    }
> -
>      /*
>       * We require at least one output segment each for the virtio_blk_outhdr
>       * and the SCSI command block.
> @@ -173,20 +165,26 @@ static void virtio_blk_handle_scsi(VirtIOBlockReq *req)
>      }
>  
>      /*
> -     * No support for bidirection commands yet.
> +     * The scsi inhdr is placed in the second-to-last input segment, just
> +     * before the regular inhdr.
>       */
> -    if (req->elem.out_num > 2 && req->elem.in_num > 3) {
> -        virtio_blk_req_complete(req, VIRTIO_BLK_S_UNSUPP);
> -        g_free(req);
> -        return;
> +    req->scsi = (void *)req->elem.in_sg[req->elem.in_num - 2].iov_base;
> +
> +    if ((req->dev->vdev.guest_features & (1 << VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI)) == 0) {
> +        status = VIRTIO_BLK_S_UNSUPP;
> +        goto fail;
>      }
>  
>      /*
> -     * The scsi inhdr is placed in the second-to-last input segment, just
> -     * before the regular inhdr.
> +     * No support for bidirection commands yet.
>       */
> -    req->scsi = (void *)req->elem.in_sg[req->elem.in_num - 2].iov_base;
> +    if (req->elem.out_num > 2 && req->elem.in_num > 3) {
> +        status = VIRTIO_BLK_S_UNSUPP;
> +        goto fail;
> +    }
>  
> +#ifdef __linux__
> +    struct sg_io_hdr hdr;
>      memset(&hdr, 0, sizeof(struct sg_io_hdr));
>      hdr.interface_id = 'S';
>      hdr.cmd_len = req->elem.out_sg[1].iov_len;
> @@ -229,9 +227,7 @@ static void virtio_blk_handle_scsi(VirtIOBlockReq *req)
>  
>      ret = bdrv_ioctl(req->dev->bs, SG_IO, &hdr);
>      if (ret) {
> -        status = VIRTIO_BLK_S_UNSUPP;
> -        hdr.status = ret;
> -        hdr.resid = hdr.dxfer_len;
> +        goto fail;
>      } else if (hdr.status) {
>          status = VIRTIO_BLK_S_IOERR;
>      } else {
> @@ -258,14 +254,16 @@ static void virtio_blk_handle_scsi(VirtIOBlockReq *req)
>  
>      virtio_blk_req_complete(req, status);
>      g_free(req);
> -}
>  #else
> -static void virtio_blk_handle_scsi(VirtIOBlockReq *req)
> -{
> -    virtio_blk_req_complete(req, VIRTIO_BLK_S_UNSUPP);
> +    abort();
> +#endif
> +
> +fail:
> +    /* Just put anything nonzero so that the ioctl fails in the guest.  */
> +    stl_p(&req->scsi->errors, 255);
> +    virtio_blk_req_complete(req, status);

I get to following compile error:
In function ‘virtio_blk_handle_request’:
virtio-blk.c:264:28: error: ‘status’ may be used uninitialized in this function 
[-Werror=uninitialized]
virtio-blk.c:151:9: note: ‘status’ was declared here
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors

Are you using  -disable-werror ?

Orit
>      g_free(req);
>  }
> -#endif /* __linux__ */
>  
>  typedef struct MultiReqBuffer {
>      BlockRequest        blkreq[32];




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]