[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re : Regression: more 0.12 regression (SeaBIOS related?
From: |
Daniel P. Berrange |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re : Regression: more 0.12 regression (SeaBIOS related?) |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Mar 2012 14:37:47 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 11:28:25AM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 14:09:05 +0000
> "Daniel P. Berrange" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 09:01:12AM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 10:56:01AM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 06:31:31 -0800 (PST)
> > > > Alain Ribière <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I ran qemu 1.0.1 and the latest SeaBIOS (from the git) with the
> > > > > following options :
> > > >
> > > > What's the git HEAD?
> > > >
> > > > Coincidentally, I was playing with MS-DOS 6.22 yesterday and hit an
> > > > issue right
> > > > during bootup. After debugging a bit, I found out that latest seabios
> > > > fixes the
> > > > problem but couldn't identify the actual commit.
> > > >
> > > > The git HEAD of my seabios repo is c5c488f46b.
> > >
> > > Daniel reported a similar error. I haven't had a chance to look at it
> > > yet.
> >
> > This was the issue where QEMU's binary build of Seabios was broken.
> > Rebuilding the exact same Seabios changeset from source works fine.
>
> Are you running qemu 1.0 or latest from git?
Using GIT
> qemu 1.0 has seabios from commit 8e301472e324, I don't get the problem with
> this one. But latest qemu from git has seabios 1.6.3.1, it's with that
> version that I get my problem.
That's the same I found - simply rebuilding 1.6.3.1 gives a binary that
works fine.
> Using latest seabios makes it go away, didn't try re-building 1.6.3.1 though.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
- [Qemu-devel] Regression: more 0.12 regression (SeaBIOS related?), Alain Ribière, 2012/03/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Regression: more 0.12 regression (SeaBIOS related?), Kevin O'Connor, 2012/03/07
- [Qemu-devel] Re : Regression: more 0.12 regression (SeaBIOS related?), Alain Ribière, 2012/03/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re : Regression: more 0.12 regression (SeaBIOS related?), Luiz Capitulino, 2012/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re : Regression: more 0.12 regression (SeaBIOS related?), Kevin O'Connor, 2012/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re : Regression: more 0.12 regression (SeaBIOS related?), Daniel P. Berrange, 2012/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re : Regression: more 0.12 regression (SeaBIOS related?), Luiz Capitulino, 2012/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] Re : Regression: more 0.12 regression (SeaBIOS related?), Peter Stuge, 2012/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re : Regression: more 0.12 regression (SeaBIOS related?),
Daniel P. Berrange <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re : Regression: more 0.12 regression (SeaBIOS related?), Luiz Capitulino, 2012/03/08
- [Qemu-devel] Re : Re : Regression: more 0.12 regression (SeaBIOS related?), Alain Ribière, 2012/03/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re : Regression: more 0.12 regression (SeaBIOS related?), Kevin O'Connor, 2012/03/11
- [Qemu-devel] Re : Re : Regression: more 0.12 regression (SeaBIOS related?), Alain Ribière, 2012/03/12