[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:52:48 +0000 |
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Martin Mailand <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi Stefan,
>> you are right, the performance for the commits 0b9b128530b and 4fefc55ab04d
>> are both good.
>> What is the best approach to stay in the qemu-kvm.git history?
>
> I didn't know the answer so I asked on #git on freenode:
And additional information from Avi:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/82851
Hope this helps.
Stefan
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Dongsu Park, 2012/02/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/02/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Dongsu Park, 2012/02/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/02/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Martin Mailand, 2012/02/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/02/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Martin Mailand, 2012/02/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Martin Mailand, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2012/02/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] virtio-blk performance regression and qemu-kvm,
Stefan Hajnoczi <=