qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 03/16 v6] Add API to check whether a physic


From: Wen Congyang
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 03/16 v6] Add API to check whether a physical address is I/O address
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:03:20 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100413 Fedora/3.0.4-2.fc13 Thunderbird/3.0.4

At 02/15/2012 12:52 AM, Jan Kiszka Wrote:
> On 2012-02-09 04:21, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> This API will be used in the following patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  cpu-common.h |    2 ++
>>  exec.c       |   16 ++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/cpu-common.h b/cpu-common.h
>> index a40c57d..d047137 100644
>> --- a/cpu-common.h
>> +++ b/cpu-common.h
>> @@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ void cpu_physical_memory_unmap(void *buffer, 
>> target_phys_addr_t len,
>>  void *cpu_register_map_client(void *opaque, void (*callback)(void *opaque));
>>  void cpu_unregister_map_client(void *cookie);
>>  
>> +bool is_io_addr(target_phys_addr_t phys_addr);
> 
> Something like cpu_physical_memory_is_io would be more consistent with
> other APIs around.

Do you mean change the API's name? If so, I will change it.

> 
>> +
>>  /* Coalesced MMIO regions are areas where write operations can be reordered.
>>   * This usually implies that write operations are side-effect free.  This 
>> allows
>>   * batching which can make a major impact on performance when using
>> diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
>> index b81677a..edc5684 100644
>> --- a/exec.c
>> +++ b/exec.c
>> @@ -4435,3 +4435,19 @@ bool virtio_is_big_endian(void)
>>  #undef env
>>  
>>  #endif
>> +
>> +bool is_io_addr(target_phys_addr_t phys_addr)
>> +{
>> +    ram_addr_t pd;
>> +    PhysPageDesc p;
>> +
>> +    p = phys_page_find(phys_addr >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS);
>> +    pd = p.phys_offset;
>> +
>> +    if (!is_ram_rom_romd(pd)) {
> 
> return !is_ram_rom_romd(pd); ?

Yes, I will change the code.

Thanks
Wen Congyang

> 
>> +        /* I/O region */
>> +        return true;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return false;
>> +}
> 
> Jan
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]