qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we need -no-kvm-pit and -no-kvm-pi


From: Jan Kiszka
Subject: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we need -no-kvm-pit and -no-kvm-pit-reinjection semantics?
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:33:51 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666

Hi all,

I've finished a first version of cleaned-up in-kernel KVM PIT support.
That will be rolled out once the base support for irqchip has been merged.

I'm now wondering if and how to model two control knobs we have in qemu-kvm:

 o -no-kvm-pit, ie. disable the in-kernel PIT even when {A,IOA,}PIC
   are kernel based (default: off, ie. use in-kernel PIT)

 o -no-kvm-pit-reinjection, ie. control over the lost ticks reinjection
   logic in the kernel (default: off, ie. do reinject)

So far I dropped the former and modeled the latter via a qdev property.
But I tend to think that even the latter knob is superfluous. In that
case I would also deprecate the original switches in qemu-kvm, just like
recently done with -tdf.

Other thoughts?

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]