qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] PL011: Fix ID reporting


From: Marek Vasut
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] PL011: Fix ID reporting
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 17:02:59 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0-1-amd64; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; )

> On 7 January 2012 20:56, Marek Vasut <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> On 7 January 2012 20:11, Marek Vasut <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> > The AMBA IDs are supposed to be at the end of 0x2000 block, which the
> >> > PL011 UART allocates. Current QEMU implementation puts those IDs at
> >> > 0x1000 offset, which is wrong. The QEMU implementation also allocates
> >> > only 0x1000 instead of 0x2000 of space.
> >> 
> >> Why do you think this change is correct? The PL011 TRM
> >> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ddi0183g/I18381.html
> >> says the ID registers are at 0xFE0..0xFFC.
> >> and for instance on the PBX-A9 devboard:
> >> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.dui0440b/Bbajihec.html
> >> the UARTs are at 0x10009000, 0x1000A000, 0x1000B000, 0x1000C000, so
> >> they clearly can't be 0x2000 in size.
> > 
> > Then we have a problem, because eg. on freescale mx28 they are 0x2000
> > big. The only conclusion I can draw from this is that the size of the
> > segment that can be assigned to PL011 is variable and the ID-octet is
> > always at the end.
> 
> Can you point me to some documentation? I looked at
> http://cache.freescale.com/files/dsp/doc/ref_manual/MCIMX28RM.pdf?fsrch=1&s
> r=7 (i.MX28 Applications Processor Reference Manual) and although it has a
> number of UARTs none of them looked obviously like PL011s.

That's it, look at DUART section and Memory map section.

M
> 
> -- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]